A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Credal-Decision-Tree-Based Ensembles for Spatial Prediction of Landslides
Spatial landslide susceptibility assessment is a fundamental part of landslide risk management and land-use planning. The main objective of this study is to apply the Credal Decision Tree (CDT), adaptive boosting Credal Decision Tree (AdaCDT), and random subspace Credal Decision Tree (RSCDT) models to construct landslide susceptibility maps in Zhashui County, China. The observed 169 historical landslides were classified into two groups: 70% (118 landslides) for training and 30% (51 landslides) for validation. To compare and validate the performance of the three models, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were utilized. Specifically, the success rates of the CDT model, AdaCDT model, and RSCDT model were 0.788, 0.821, and 0.847, respectively, while the corresponding prediction rates were 0.771, 0.802, and 0.861, respectively. In sum, the two ensemble models can effectively improve the performance accuracy of an individual CDT model, and the RSCDT model was proven to be superior to the other two models. Therefore, ensemble models are capable of being novel and promising approaches for the spatial prediction and zonation of a certain region’s landslide susceptibility.
Credal-Decision-Tree-Based Ensembles for Spatial Prediction of Landslides
Spatial landslide susceptibility assessment is a fundamental part of landslide risk management and land-use planning. The main objective of this study is to apply the Credal Decision Tree (CDT), adaptive boosting Credal Decision Tree (AdaCDT), and random subspace Credal Decision Tree (RSCDT) models to construct landslide susceptibility maps in Zhashui County, China. The observed 169 historical landslides were classified into two groups: 70% (118 landslides) for training and 30% (51 landslides) for validation. To compare and validate the performance of the three models, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were utilized. Specifically, the success rates of the CDT model, AdaCDT model, and RSCDT model were 0.788, 0.821, and 0.847, respectively, while the corresponding prediction rates were 0.771, 0.802, and 0.861, respectively. In sum, the two ensemble models can effectively improve the performance accuracy of an individual CDT model, and the RSCDT model was proven to be superior to the other two models. Therefore, ensemble models are capable of being novel and promising approaches for the spatial prediction and zonation of a certain region’s landslide susceptibility.
Credal-Decision-Tree-Based Ensembles for Spatial Prediction of Landslides
Jingyun Gui (author) / Ignacio Pérez-Rey (author) / Miao Yao (author) / Fasuo Zhao (author) / Wei Chen (author)
2023
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Improvement of Credal Decision Trees Using Ensemble Frameworks for Groundwater Potential Modeling
DOAJ | 2020
|Application of Geospatial Tools for Prediction of Landslides Using Decision-Based Method
Springer Verlag | 2024
|Determination of the spatial and temporal activity of landslides based on tree-ring analysis
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
|Prediction of earthquake induced landslides
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
|Tree-Ring Based Chronology of Landslides in the Shirakami Mountains, Japan
DOAJ | 2021
|