A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Conventional triaxial loading and unloading test and PFC numerical simulation of rock with single fracture
Take the metamorphic sandstone as the reference object, by making rock like samples with fractures, the conventional triaxial loading and unloading test and PFC numerical simulation of rock like sample with single fracture were conducted, and the effects of the loading path, inclined angle of fracture, axial stress level during unloading, initial confining pressure during unloading on the compressive strength, peak strain and crack propagation evolution of the samples were considered. The compressive strength of the specimen under triaxial unloading is smaller than that under triaxial loading. The peak strain of the specimen under triaxial unloading is also smaller than that under triaxial loading. The specimen is more prone to brittle failure. When the axial stress level is the same during unloading, with the increase of the initial confining pressure during unloading, the difference of the compressive strength of the specimens with different inclined angles of fracture gradually decreases. Under the condition of uniaxial compression and triaxial compression, the failure of all specimens is tensile failure, and the shear failure is the main one during unloading.
Conventional triaxial loading and unloading test and PFC numerical simulation of rock with single fracture
Take the metamorphic sandstone as the reference object, by making rock like samples with fractures, the conventional triaxial loading and unloading test and PFC numerical simulation of rock like sample with single fracture were conducted, and the effects of the loading path, inclined angle of fracture, axial stress level during unloading, initial confining pressure during unloading on the compressive strength, peak strain and crack propagation evolution of the samples were considered. The compressive strength of the specimen under triaxial unloading is smaller than that under triaxial loading. The peak strain of the specimen under triaxial unloading is also smaller than that under triaxial loading. The specimen is more prone to brittle failure. When the axial stress level is the same during unloading, with the increase of the initial confining pressure during unloading, the difference of the compressive strength of the specimens with different inclined angles of fracture gradually decreases. Under the condition of uniaxial compression and triaxial compression, the failure of all specimens is tensile failure, and the shear failure is the main one during unloading.
Conventional triaxial loading and unloading test and PFC numerical simulation of rock with single fracture
Yin Tang (author) / Haijun Chen (author) / Liangxiao Xiong (author) / Zhongyuan Xu (author)
2024
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Research on rock triaxial cyclic loading and unloading characteristics based on PFC3D
DOAJ | 2022
|Triaxial unloading test of rocks and its implication for rock burst
Online Contents | 2001
|Hydraulic Fracture Feature of Rock Under Unloading Based on Test and Numerical Simulation
Springer Verlag | 2024
|Research on Altered Rock at a Hydropower StationBased on Triaxial Unloading Test
DOAJ | 2020
|British Library Online Contents | 2017
|