A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Prioritization of Strategic Intangible Assets in Make/Buy Decisions
Every company, in a knowledge-based economy and, in a sustainability-aware era, is “doomed„ to deal with a critical mass of strategic assets, in order to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage. Maintaining this system up-to-date requires financial/organizational efforts. Therefore, in order to optimize performance, it is necessary to detect which are the assets that can be outsourced/externalized without jeopardizing the business model architecture. Nevertheless, several studies confirm the inherent risks upcoming with any decision of outsourcing; pursuing a bearable long-term advantage over competitors mostly involves combinations of resources and capabilities, i.e., intangible assets. By the means of a multi-criteria indicator, the proposed framework builds a quantitative relational ranking of such resources, disclosing their critical weight (revealing which assets are actually strategic), hence the convenience for each of them to be outsourced or kept “in-house„ to create sustainable value. This solution permits a strategy-level prioritization to take informed decisions on outsourcing candidates, also returning further analytics on the status of each investigated entity. Designed as a discriminating tool in make/buy resolutions to be used alongside traditional cost-based criteria, it represents a comprehensive approach capable of appreciating the complexity of the problem and the involved risks in order to keep a sustainable momentum.
Prioritization of Strategic Intangible Assets in Make/Buy Decisions
Every company, in a knowledge-based economy and, in a sustainability-aware era, is “doomed„ to deal with a critical mass of strategic assets, in order to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage. Maintaining this system up-to-date requires financial/organizational efforts. Therefore, in order to optimize performance, it is necessary to detect which are the assets that can be outsourced/externalized without jeopardizing the business model architecture. Nevertheless, several studies confirm the inherent risks upcoming with any decision of outsourcing; pursuing a bearable long-term advantage over competitors mostly involves combinations of resources and capabilities, i.e., intangible assets. By the means of a multi-criteria indicator, the proposed framework builds a quantitative relational ranking of such resources, disclosing their critical weight (revealing which assets are actually strategic), hence the convenience for each of them to be outsourced or kept “in-house„ to create sustainable value. This solution permits a strategy-level prioritization to take informed decisions on outsourcing candidates, also returning further analytics on the status of each investigated entity. Designed as a discriminating tool in make/buy resolutions to be used alongside traditional cost-based criteria, it represents a comprehensive approach capable of appreciating the complexity of the problem and the involved risks in order to keep a sustainable momentum.
Prioritization of Strategic Intangible Assets in Make/Buy Decisions
Franco Maria Battagello (author) / Livio Cricelli (author) / Michele Grimaldi (author)
2019
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
intangible assets , strategic capital, sustainable competitive advantage , sustainable value , make/buy , outsourcing , strategic alignment , decision support , resource allocation , Environmental effects of industries and plants , TD194-195 , Renewable energy sources , TJ807-830 , Environmental sciences , GE1-350
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
How intangible assets benefit architects
British Library Online Contents | 2003
|Practice - How intangible assets benefit architects
Online Contents | 2003
|Introduction: Intangible Assets and Regional Economic Growth
Online Contents | 2012
|Introduction: Intangible Assets and Regional Economic Growth
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2012
|European regional convergence revisited: the role of intangible assets
Springer Verlag | 2016
|