A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Combined peak reduction and self-consumption using proximal policy optimisation
Residential demand response programs aim to activate demand flexibility at the household level. In recent years, reinforcement learning (RL) has gained significant attention for these type of applications. A major challenge of RL algorithms is data efficiency. New RL algorithms, such as proximal policy optimisation (PPO), have tried to increase data efficiency. Additionally, combining RL with transfer learning has been proposed in an effort to mitigate this challenge. In this work, we further improve upon state-of-the-art transfer learning performance by incorporating demand response domain knowledge into the learning pipeline. We evaluate our approach on a demand response use case where peak shaving and self-consumption is incentivised by means of a capacity tariff. We show our adapted version of PPO, combined with transfer learning, reduces cost by 14.51% compared to a regular hysteresis controller and by 6.68% compared to traditional PPO.
Combined peak reduction and self-consumption using proximal policy optimisation
Residential demand response programs aim to activate demand flexibility at the household level. In recent years, reinforcement learning (RL) has gained significant attention for these type of applications. A major challenge of RL algorithms is data efficiency. New RL algorithms, such as proximal policy optimisation (PPO), have tried to increase data efficiency. Additionally, combining RL with transfer learning has been proposed in an effort to mitigate this challenge. In this work, we further improve upon state-of-the-art transfer learning performance by incorporating demand response domain knowledge into the learning pipeline. We evaluate our approach on a demand response use case where peak shaving and self-consumption is incentivised by means of a capacity tariff. We show our adapted version of PPO, combined with transfer learning, reduces cost by 14.51% compared to a regular hysteresis controller and by 6.68% compared to traditional PPO.
Combined peak reduction and self-consumption using proximal policy optimisation
Thijs Peirelinck (author) / Chris Hermans (author) / Fred Spiessens (author) / Geert Deconinck (author)
2024
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Combined Optimisation Simulation Model for Groundwater Management Policy Options
| British Library Online Contents | 2007
Water Consumption Under Peak‐Responsibility Pricing
| Wiley | 1978