A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
This article discusses an incomplete search on the different meanings understood from urbanism. It does so by discussing the relation of urbanism with urban planning and urban design. The similarities and differences between these concepts and the fact that they are often used indistinctly are pointed out. The current article is organized around two hypotheses, where the first involves a broader understanding of urbanism, which incorporates urban planning, and the second is based on the idea that the conceptual distinction between these two fields may be defined according to how close or how far urbanism is from art and architecture. The closer urbanism is to art and architecture, the more it moves away from urban planning. The ideas presented here are intended to be provocative, and the author is aware of reactions they may generate. This discussion is based on a technical literature as well as on debates with other researchers and students. The article starts with an introduction regarding the difficulties and complexities of an epistemological discussion while later sections point out similarities and distinctions between the two main concepts. The conclusion makes the author's position clear, but suggests that this issue needs further discussion.
This article discusses an incomplete search on the different meanings understood from urbanism. It does so by discussing the relation of urbanism with urban planning and urban design. The similarities and differences between these concepts and the fact that they are often used indistinctly are pointed out. The current article is organized around two hypotheses, where the first involves a broader understanding of urbanism, which incorporates urban planning, and the second is based on the idea that the conceptual distinction between these two fields may be defined according to how close or how far urbanism is from art and architecture. The closer urbanism is to art and architecture, the more it moves away from urban planning. The ideas presented here are intended to be provocative, and the author is aware of reactions they may generate. This discussion is based on a technical literature as well as on debates with other researchers and students. The article starts with an introduction regarding the difficulties and complexities of an epistemological discussion while later sections point out similarities and distinctions between the two main concepts. The conclusion makes the author's position clear, but suggests that this issue needs further discussion.
The meaning of urbanism
Clóvis Ultramari (author)
2009
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Southeast Asian urbanism : the meaning and power of social space
UB Braunschweig | 2000
|Rethinking the Meaning of Place: Conceiving Place in Architecture-Urbanism
British Library Online Contents | 2011
|Grounding Landscape Urbanism and New Urbanism
Online Contents | 2015
|TIBKAT | 2016
|