A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Comparison of Projections of Precipitation over Yangtze River Basin of China by Different Climate Models
Based on the observational dataset CN05.1 and the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), this study assesses the performance of CMIP5 and CMIP6 projects in projecting mean precipitation at annual and seasonal timescales in the Yangtze River Basin of China over the period 2015–2020 under medium emission scenarios (RCP4.5/SSP2-4.5). Results indicate that the multi-model ensemble (MME) of CMIP6 overall has lower relative bias and root-mean square error of both annual and seasonal mean than that of CMIP5, except for winter, but both of the two ensembles show the best projected accuracy in winter. Generally, CMIP6 outperformed CMIP5 in capturing spatial and temporal pattern over the YRB, especially in the midstream and downstream areas, which have high precipitation. Further analyses suggest that the CMIP6 GCMs have lower median normalized root-mean square error than CMIP5 GCMs. Based on the Taylor skill (TS) score, both CMIP6 and CMIP5 GCMs are ranked to evaluate relative model performance. CMIP6 GCMs have higher ranks than CMIP5 GCMs, with an average TS score of 0.68 (0.55) for CMIP6 (CMIP5), and three out of the five highest scored GCMs are CMIP6 GCMs. However, the CMIP6 precipitation projections are still quite uncertain, thus requiring further assessment and correction.
Comparison of Projections of Precipitation over Yangtze River Basin of China by Different Climate Models
Based on the observational dataset CN05.1 and the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), this study assesses the performance of CMIP5 and CMIP6 projects in projecting mean precipitation at annual and seasonal timescales in the Yangtze River Basin of China over the period 2015–2020 under medium emission scenarios (RCP4.5/SSP2-4.5). Results indicate that the multi-model ensemble (MME) of CMIP6 overall has lower relative bias and root-mean square error of both annual and seasonal mean than that of CMIP5, except for winter, but both of the two ensembles show the best projected accuracy in winter. Generally, CMIP6 outperformed CMIP5 in capturing spatial and temporal pattern over the YRB, especially in the midstream and downstream areas, which have high precipitation. Further analyses suggest that the CMIP6 GCMs have lower median normalized root-mean square error than CMIP5 GCMs. Based on the Taylor skill (TS) score, both CMIP6 and CMIP5 GCMs are ranked to evaluate relative model performance. CMIP6 GCMs have higher ranks than CMIP5 GCMs, with an average TS score of 0.68 (0.55) for CMIP6 (CMIP5), and three out of the five highest scored GCMs are CMIP6 GCMs. However, the CMIP6 precipitation projections are still quite uncertain, thus requiring further assessment and correction.
Comparison of Projections of Precipitation over Yangtze River Basin of China by Different Climate Models
Hong Pan (author) / Youjie Jin (author) / Xiaochen Zhu (author)
2022
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under ​CC BY-SA 1.0
Trends in precipitation extremes over the Yangtze River basin
| British Library Online Contents | 2008
Spatiotemporal Variations of Precipitation Regimes across Yangtze River Basin, China
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2013
| Elsevier | 2024