A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Steps to a Planning Oriented Towards Territorializing Immanence
The essay tries to provide a contribution in the direction of a planning that is more responsive to the potential of community self-government of places, focusing in particular on some issues considered fundamental to this end, namely: the possibility of rethinking democracy as demo-dynamic; the relationship between the political sphere and the urban sphere in some political visions inspired by community self-determination; a geo-historical interpretation of the origin and evolution of the city, up to the current forms of regional urbanisation; a vision of the urban finally freed from the classic city/countryside dualism, as well as from other correlated dualisms; the need for planning to renounce any type of transcendent rationality to favour forms of territorial self- determination. On the basis of the acquisitions now matured in some interpretative strands of the aforementioned questions, a form of planning is proposed which, in order to move towards territorializing immanence, is based on the recognition of the distinction between the common good (and commoning processes) and the private or public ones, placing moreover itself within the framework of a circularly subsidiary approach which, even within the given institutional framework, tends to make the most of the self- regulation faculties, and of self-planning, already available to local communities.
Steps to a Planning Oriented Towards Territorializing Immanence
The essay tries to provide a contribution in the direction of a planning that is more responsive to the potential of community self-government of places, focusing in particular on some issues considered fundamental to this end, namely: the possibility of rethinking democracy as demo-dynamic; the relationship between the political sphere and the urban sphere in some political visions inspired by community self-determination; a geo-historical interpretation of the origin and evolution of the city, up to the current forms of regional urbanisation; a vision of the urban finally freed from the classic city/countryside dualism, as well as from other correlated dualisms; the need for planning to renounce any type of transcendent rationality to favour forms of territorial self- determination. On the basis of the acquisitions now matured in some interpretative strands of the aforementioned questions, a form of planning is proposed which, in order to move towards territorializing immanence, is based on the recognition of the distinction between the common good (and commoning processes) and the private or public ones, placing moreover itself within the framework of a circularly subsidiary approach which, even within the given institutional framework, tends to make the most of the self- regulation faculties, and of self-planning, already available to local communities.
Steps to a Planning Oriented Towards Territorializing Immanence
Luciano De Bonis (author)
2023
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Shinichi Ogawa: Roaming into Immanence
| Online Contents | 1994
Mauri-Ora: Architecture, Indigeneity, and Immanence Ethics
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2016
Essay: - "Jean Nouvel: The Aesthetics of Immanence"
| Online Contents | 2000
"Jean Nouvel: The Aesthetics of Immanence"
| British Library Online Contents | 2000