A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection
A groundwater risk assessment was carried out for 30 potable water supply systems under a framework of protecting drinking water quality across South Australia. A semi-quantitative Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM) was developed based on a “multi-barrier” approach using likelihood of release, contaminant pathway and consequence equation. Groundwater vulnerability and well integrity have been incorporated to the pathway component of the risk equation. The land use of the study basins varies from protected water reserves to heavily stocked grazing lands. Based on the risk assessment, 15 systems were considered as low risk, four as medium and 11 systems as at high risk. The GRAM risk levels were comparable with indicator bacteria—total coliform—detection. Most high risk systems were the result of poor well construction and casing corrosion rather than the land use. We carried out risk management actions, including changes to well designs and well operational practices, design to increase time of residence and setting the production zone below identified low permeable zones to provide additional barriers to contaminants. The highlight of the risk management element is the well integrity testing using down hole geophysical methods and camera views of the casing condition.
Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection
A groundwater risk assessment was carried out for 30 potable water supply systems under a framework of protecting drinking water quality across South Australia. A semi-quantitative Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM) was developed based on a “multi-barrier” approach using likelihood of release, contaminant pathway and consequence equation. Groundwater vulnerability and well integrity have been incorporated to the pathway component of the risk equation. The land use of the study basins varies from protected water reserves to heavily stocked grazing lands. Based on the risk assessment, 15 systems were considered as low risk, four as medium and 11 systems as at high risk. The GRAM risk levels were comparable with indicator bacteria—total coliform—detection. Most high risk systems were the result of poor well construction and casing corrosion rather than the land use. We carried out risk management actions, including changes to well designs and well operational practices, design to increase time of residence and setting the production zone below identified low permeable zones to provide additional barriers to contaminants. The highlight of the risk management element is the well integrity testing using down hole geophysical methods and camera views of the casing condition.
Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection
Nara Somaratne (author) / Hajrudin Zulfic (author) / Glyn Ashman (author) / Hayley Vial (author) / Brooke Swaffer (author) / Jacqueline Frizenschaf (author)
2013
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Groundwater Nitrate Pollution Sources Assessment for Contaminated Wellfield
| DOAJ | 2022
Application of Raw Groundwater ASR at Miami-Dade's West Wellfield
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000
A dynamic analysis of groundwater levels in a large fractured-karst groundwater wellfield in Henan
| DOAJ | 2021
Groundwater abstraction pollution risk assessment
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2003
| British Library Online Contents | 1999