A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Pedestrian Safety: Drivers’ Stopping Behavior at Crosswalks
The safety of a pedestrian crossing may depend on infrastructure, vehicular and pedestrian traffic characteristics. This academic research typically portrays the safety challenges knowingly caused by vehicles on crosswalks in the city of Kigali. Through carefully observing the stopping of local drivers in pedestrian crossing events, the study aims to objectively evaluate drivers’ questionable behavior against traffic flow parameters. Ten collection sites were ultimately selected purposefully and randomly to suit observations for data recording. A grand total of 10,259 crossing events were properly recorded within 280 h. Statistical analyses, practical tests and binary logistic regression models were promptly used to adequately evaluate the specific behaviors. Woefully, 82.4% of drivers violate crosswalks, endangering crossing pedestrians. Motorcyclists typically exhibit the most aggressive behavior. Car drivers are relatively less aggressive, whereby 60% managed to brake in the events. Local buses and authorized bicycles enthusiastically shared a negligible collective percentage of 2%, being aggressive and not stopping. In general, cars are 10.389 times more likely to voluntarily and justly stop compared to bicycles. Maintaining more vehicles in a row is safer for a pedestrian to cross, as for each unit increase on the vehicle density scale, there were 1.956 more chances that every driver would stop. In brief, 13% to 21% of traffic variables positively predict the considerable variance in the stopping behavior model.
Pedestrian Safety: Drivers’ Stopping Behavior at Crosswalks
The safety of a pedestrian crossing may depend on infrastructure, vehicular and pedestrian traffic characteristics. This academic research typically portrays the safety challenges knowingly caused by vehicles on crosswalks in the city of Kigali. Through carefully observing the stopping of local drivers in pedestrian crossing events, the study aims to objectively evaluate drivers’ questionable behavior against traffic flow parameters. Ten collection sites were ultimately selected purposefully and randomly to suit observations for data recording. A grand total of 10,259 crossing events were properly recorded within 280 h. Statistical analyses, practical tests and binary logistic regression models were promptly used to adequately evaluate the specific behaviors. Woefully, 82.4% of drivers violate crosswalks, endangering crossing pedestrians. Motorcyclists typically exhibit the most aggressive behavior. Car drivers are relatively less aggressive, whereby 60% managed to brake in the events. Local buses and authorized bicycles enthusiastically shared a negligible collective percentage of 2%, being aggressive and not stopping. In general, cars are 10.389 times more likely to voluntarily and justly stop compared to bicycles. Maintaining more vehicles in a row is safer for a pedestrian to cross, as for each unit increase on the vehicle density scale, there were 1.956 more chances that every driver would stop. In brief, 13% to 21% of traffic variables positively predict the considerable variance in the stopping behavior model.
Pedestrian Safety: Drivers’ Stopping Behavior at Crosswalks
David Nkurunziza (author) / Rahman Tafahomi (author) / Irumva Augustin Faraja (author)
2023
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Pedestrian Crossing Behavior at Signalized Crosswalks
| ASCE | 2017
Pedestrian safety device for crosswalks equipped with safety fences
| European Patent Office | 2022
LEDSafety guideline display type landscape lighting for pedestrian safety at crosswalks
| European Patent Office | 2024