A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Preliminary Study of Computational Time Steps in a Physically Based Distributed Rainfall–Runoff Model
The choice of the computational time step (dt) value and the method for setting dt can have a bearing on the accuracy and performance of a simulation, and this effect has not been comprehensively researched across different simulation conditions. In this study, the effects of the fixed time step (FTS) method and the automatic time step (ATS) method on the simulated runoff of a distributed rainfall–runoff model were compared. The results revealed that the ATS method had less peak flow variability than the FTS method for the virtual catchment. In the FTS method, the difference in time step had more impact on the runoff simulation results than the other factors such as differences in the amount of rainfall, the density of the stream network, or the spatial resolution of the input data. Different optimal parameter values according to the computational time step were found when FTS and ATS were used in a real catchment, and the changes in the optimal parameter values were smaller in ATS than in FTS. The results of our analyses can help to yield reliable runoff simulation results.
Preliminary Study of Computational Time Steps in a Physically Based Distributed Rainfall–Runoff Model
The choice of the computational time step (dt) value and the method for setting dt can have a bearing on the accuracy and performance of a simulation, and this effect has not been comprehensively researched across different simulation conditions. In this study, the effects of the fixed time step (FTS) method and the automatic time step (ATS) method on the simulated runoff of a distributed rainfall–runoff model were compared. The results revealed that the ATS method had less peak flow variability than the FTS method for the virtual catchment. In the FTS method, the difference in time step had more impact on the runoff simulation results than the other factors such as differences in the amount of rainfall, the density of the stream network, or the spatial resolution of the input data. Different optimal parameter values according to the computational time step were found when FTS and ATS were used in a real catchment, and the changes in the optimal parameter values were smaller in ATS than in FTS. The results of our analyses can help to yield reliable runoff simulation results.
Preliminary Study of Computational Time Steps in a Physically Based Distributed Rainfall–Runoff Model
Yun Seok Choi (author) / Mun-Ju Shin (author) / Kyung Tak Kim (author)
2018
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Development and application of a physically-based distributed rainfall-runoff model
| British Library Online Contents | 2006
Integrated Physically Based Rainfall-Runoff Model Using FEM
| British Library Online Contents | 2001
Fundamentals of Physically-Based Rainfall / Runoff Models
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998
A physically based rainfall-runoff model to study flow coefficient variations
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998
Sensitivity Analysis of Physically-Based Rainfall / Runoff Models
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998