A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Industrial production and temporary development after the Emilian Earthquake.
The earthquake that on the 20th of May hit Emilia has not been one of the most disastrous in modern Italian history, but it has highlighted the problem of preservation of industrial activities during a reconstruction process. In addition, precisely this system, characterized by great vitality and productivity but also by large seismic vulnerability, was the most affected. Through an analysis of the damages suffered by the industrial facilities, not so much as single buildings but precisely as a system, we want to highlight the challenges imposed by the earthquake: on the one hand, the urgent need to provide for delocalizations and temporary structures to avoid a stop in production in the shortterm, and on the other, the redesign and antiseismic replanning of productive areas. A proposal was put forward to create temporary zones adjacent to the damaged areas, on which temporary structures should be installed. The latter would allow to limit relocations of mediumlong range, which are negative for the territory, and at the same time it would allow the flexibility necessary to reorganize the supply chains. However, in Italy, the management of temporary solutions is seen as a practice too much linked to the emergency and too little to the reconstruction process. The first measures put into place by both the State and the Regions, however, do not seem to show a true understanding of the importance of management and regulations of temporary solutions in the medium long term.
Industrial production and temporary development after the Emilian Earthquake.
The earthquake that on the 20th of May hit Emilia has not been one of the most disastrous in modern Italian history, but it has highlighted the problem of preservation of industrial activities during a reconstruction process. In addition, precisely this system, characterized by great vitality and productivity but also by large seismic vulnerability, was the most affected. Through an analysis of the damages suffered by the industrial facilities, not so much as single buildings but precisely as a system, we want to highlight the challenges imposed by the earthquake: on the one hand, the urgent need to provide for delocalizations and temporary structures to avoid a stop in production in the shortterm, and on the other, the redesign and antiseismic replanning of productive areas. A proposal was put forward to create temporary zones adjacent to the damaged areas, on which temporary structures should be installed. The latter would allow to limit relocations of mediumlong range, which are negative for the territory, and at the same time it would allow the flexibility necessary to reorganize the supply chains. However, in Italy, the management of temporary solutions is seen as a practice too much linked to the emergency and too little to the reconstruction process. The first measures put into place by both the State and the Regions, however, do not seem to show a true understanding of the importance of management and regulations of temporary solutions in the medium long term.
Industrial production and temporary development after the Emilian Earthquake.
Matteo Scamporrino (author)
2014
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Jozef Emilian Peszke (1845-1916)
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993
|The Emilian model: Institutional challenges
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1999
|The Emilian Model: Institutional Challenges
Online Contents | 1999
|The Emilian tributaries of the Po river
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000
|Modern trends in tracer hydrology / Emilian Gaspar ; Vol. 2
TIBKAT | 1987
|