A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Classification of Hydraulic Jump in Rough Beds
This paper presents a classification using a decision tree algorithm of hydraulic jump over rough beds based on the approach Froude number, Fr1. Specifically, 581 datasets, from literature, were analyzed. Of these, 280 datasets were for natural rough beds and 301 were for artificial rough beds. The said dataset was divided into four classes based on the energy losses. To compare the performance of the decision tree classifier (J48), a multi-layer neural network (NN) was used. The results suggest an improved performance in terms of classification accuracy by the J48 algorithm in comparison to the NN classifier. Furthermore, the classifier model had only four leaves and achieved an accuracy of 91.56%. Furthermore, classification results showed that the first class (A) of hydraulic jump over the rough beds is approximately similar to that for the smooth bed. Moreover, in the next three classes (B, C, and D), upper values of Fr1 decreased with respect to the smooth bed classes. Lastly, in class D, the upper value of Fr1 reduced to 7.45, which indicates that the shear stress (i.e., the energy loss) grows sharply with increasing Fr1. Put simply, bed roughness effectively increases the energy dissipation with an increase in the Fr1.
Classification of Hydraulic Jump in Rough Beds
This paper presents a classification using a decision tree algorithm of hydraulic jump over rough beds based on the approach Froude number, Fr1. Specifically, 581 datasets, from literature, were analyzed. Of these, 280 datasets were for natural rough beds and 301 were for artificial rough beds. The said dataset was divided into four classes based on the energy losses. To compare the performance of the decision tree classifier (J48), a multi-layer neural network (NN) was used. The results suggest an improved performance in terms of classification accuracy by the J48 algorithm in comparison to the NN classifier. Furthermore, the classifier model had only four leaves and achieved an accuracy of 91.56%. Furthermore, classification results showed that the first class (A) of hydraulic jump over the rough beds is approximately similar to that for the smooth bed. Moreover, in the next three classes (B, C, and D), upper values of Fr1 decreased with respect to the smooth bed classes. Lastly, in class D, the upper value of Fr1 reduced to 7.45, which indicates that the shear stress (i.e., the energy loss) grows sharply with increasing Fr1. Put simply, bed roughness effectively increases the energy dissipation with an increase in the Fr1.
Classification of Hydraulic Jump in Rough Beds
Ghorban Mahtabi (author) / Barkha Chaplot (author) / Hazi Mohammad Azamathulla (author) / Mahesh Pal (author)
2020
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Forced hydraulic jump on non-protruding rough beds
Online Contents | 2011
|Hydraulic Jump Stilling Basin Design over Rough Beds
ASCE | 2020
|Forced hydraulic jump on non-protruding rough beds
British Library Online Contents | 2011
|Hydraulic jump on rough beds: conceptual modeling and experimental validation
DOAJ | 2021
|Design of Hydraulic Jump Stilling Basin over Rough Beds Using CFD
Springer Verlag | 2024
|