A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Assessing the Residual Stand Damage after Thinning with Different Levels of Mechanization
Thinning is a silvicultural process in which trees are both harvested selectively and systematically removed from a stand to enhance forest management and ecosystem dynamics. However, this practice is challenged by the mechanical damage to residual trees, and the nature of this damage, particularly on stand damage during mechanized row-thinning and manual selective thinning, in South Korea is unknown. Therefore, objectives of this study were to compare stand damage levels and wound characteristics between three different thinning operations: manual selective, manual row-, and mechanized row-thinning. After thinning, 12%, 15%, and 10% of the residual damaged trees were observed in manual selective, manual row-, and mechanized row-thinning, respectively. Both types of row-thinning predominantly demonstrated damages at the stem and butt region, whereas in manual selective thinning, the most of the damages occurred on the roots. Manual selective thinning exhibited a slightly larger average wound size (207 cm2) compared to mechanized row- (181 cm2) and manual row-thinning (165 cm2). The wound sizes on the stem in mechanized row-thinning were significantly higher than manual selective (p < 0.05). These results may be helpful in understanding exposure to damage among different thinning types and in managing its occurrence in future practices.
Assessing the Residual Stand Damage after Thinning with Different Levels of Mechanization
Thinning is a silvicultural process in which trees are both harvested selectively and systematically removed from a stand to enhance forest management and ecosystem dynamics. However, this practice is challenged by the mechanical damage to residual trees, and the nature of this damage, particularly on stand damage during mechanized row-thinning and manual selective thinning, in South Korea is unknown. Therefore, objectives of this study were to compare stand damage levels and wound characteristics between three different thinning operations: manual selective, manual row-, and mechanized row-thinning. After thinning, 12%, 15%, and 10% of the residual damaged trees were observed in manual selective, manual row-, and mechanized row-thinning, respectively. Both types of row-thinning predominantly demonstrated damages at the stem and butt region, whereas in manual selective thinning, the most of the damages occurred on the roots. Manual selective thinning exhibited a slightly larger average wound size (207 cm2) compared to mechanized row- (181 cm2) and manual row-thinning (165 cm2). The wound sizes on the stem in mechanized row-thinning were significantly higher than manual selective (p < 0.05). These results may be helpful in understanding exposure to damage among different thinning types and in managing its occurrence in future practices.
Assessing the Residual Stand Damage after Thinning with Different Levels of Mechanization
Eunjai Lee (author) / Sang-Tae Lee (author) / Ho-Seong Mun (author) / Sanghoon Chung (author) / Jae-Heun Oh (author)
2024
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Damage to Residual Trees in Thinning of Broadleaf Stand by Mechanised Harvesting System
| DOAJ | 2022
Residual Stand Damage under Different Harvesting Methods and Mitigation Strategies
| DOAJ | 2021
Short-Term Recovery of Residual Tree Damage during Successive Thinning Operations
| DOAJ | 2020
| British Library Online Contents | 2000
Farm mechanization & buildings
TIBKAT | 19.1967 - 20.1968 = Nr. 213-232