A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Critical needs to close monitoring gaps in pan-tropical wetland CH4 emissions
Global wetlands are the largest and most uncertain natural source of atmospheric methane (CH _4 ). The FLUXNET-CH _4 synthesis initiative has established a global network of flux tower infrastructure, offering valuable data products and fostering a dedicated community for the measurement and analysis of methane flux data. Existing studies using the FLUXNET-CH _4 Community Product v1.0 have provided invaluable insights into the drivers of ecosystem-to-regional spatial patterns and daily-to-decadal temporal dynamics in temperate, boreal, and Arctic climate regions. However, as the wetland CH _4 monitoring network grows, there is a critical knowledge gap about where new monitoring infrastructure ought to be located to improve understanding of the global wetland CH _4 budget. Here we address this gap with a spatial representativeness analysis at existing and hypothetical observation sites, using 16 process-based wetland biogeochemistry models and machine learning. We find that, in addition to eddy covariance monitoring sites, existing chamber sites are important complements, especially over high latitudes and the tropics. Furthermore, expanding the current monitoring network for wetland CH _4 emissions should prioritize, first, tropical and second, sub-tropical semi-arid wetland regions. Considering those new hypothetical wetland sites from tropical and semi-arid climate zones could significantly improve global estimates of wetland CH _4 emissions and reduce bias by 79% (from 76 to 16 TgCH _4 y ^−1 ), compared with using solely existing monitoring networks. Our study thus demonstrates an approach for long-term strategic expansion of flux observations.
Critical needs to close monitoring gaps in pan-tropical wetland CH4 emissions
Global wetlands are the largest and most uncertain natural source of atmospheric methane (CH _4 ). The FLUXNET-CH _4 synthesis initiative has established a global network of flux tower infrastructure, offering valuable data products and fostering a dedicated community for the measurement and analysis of methane flux data. Existing studies using the FLUXNET-CH _4 Community Product v1.0 have provided invaluable insights into the drivers of ecosystem-to-regional spatial patterns and daily-to-decadal temporal dynamics in temperate, boreal, and Arctic climate regions. However, as the wetland CH _4 monitoring network grows, there is a critical knowledge gap about where new monitoring infrastructure ought to be located to improve understanding of the global wetland CH _4 budget. Here we address this gap with a spatial representativeness analysis at existing and hypothetical observation sites, using 16 process-based wetland biogeochemistry models and machine learning. We find that, in addition to eddy covariance monitoring sites, existing chamber sites are important complements, especially over high latitudes and the tropics. Furthermore, expanding the current monitoring network for wetland CH _4 emissions should prioritize, first, tropical and second, sub-tropical semi-arid wetland regions. Considering those new hypothetical wetland sites from tropical and semi-arid climate zones could significantly improve global estimates of wetland CH _4 emissions and reduce bias by 79% (from 76 to 16 TgCH _4 y ^−1 ), compared with using solely existing monitoring networks. Our study thus demonstrates an approach for long-term strategic expansion of flux observations.
Critical needs to close monitoring gaps in pan-tropical wetland CH4 emissions
Qing Zhu (author) / Kunxiaojia Yuan (author) / Fa Li (author) / William J Riley (author) / Alison Hoyt (author) / Robert Jackson (author) / Gavin McNicol (author) / Min Chen (author) / Sara H Knox (author) / Otto Briner (author)
2024
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Engineering Index Backfile | 1938
Rapid Response Monitoring of a Coastal Wetland during Tropical Storm Cristobal
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2021
|