A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
History and future of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming
The article by Cook et al offers an interesting new methodological approach to the debate about (supposedly lacking) scientific consensus on global warming, showing that contrarian claims that there was no such consensus are clearly misleading. But once the attribution issue can be regarded as settled, new questions and controversies arise. They ultimately result from the different technological and organizational pathways towards a new global society model that takes its adverse climate change effects into account and seeks for new, but also risky solutions.
History and future of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming
The article by Cook et al offers an interesting new methodological approach to the debate about (supposedly lacking) scientific consensus on global warming, showing that contrarian claims that there was no such consensus are clearly misleading. But once the attribution issue can be regarded as settled, new questions and controversies arise. They ultimately result from the different technological and organizational pathways towards a new global society model that takes its adverse climate change effects into account and seeks for new, but also risky solutions.
History and future of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming
Fritz Reusswig (author)
2013
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
History and future of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming
| IOP Institute of Physics | 2013
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature
| IOP Institute of Physics | 2013
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature
| DOAJ | 2013
Comment on ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature’
| DOAJ | 2015
Comment on ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature’
| DOAJ | 2016