A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Material Footprint of Low-Income Households in Finland—Consequences for the Sustainability Debate
The article assesses the material footprints of households living on a minimum amount of social benefits in Finland and discusses the consequences in terms of ecological and social sustainability. The data were collected using interviews and a questionnaire on the consumption patterns of 18 single households. The results are compared to a study on households with varying income levels, to average consumption patterns and to decent minimum reference budgets. The low-income households have lower material footprints than average and most of the material footprints are below the socially sustainable level of consumption, which is based on decent minimum reference budgets. However, the amount of resources used by most of the households studied here is still at least double that required for ecological sustainability. The simultaneous existence of both deprivation and overconsumption requires measures from both politicians and companies to make consumption sustainable. For example, both adequate housing and economic mobility need to be addressed. Measures to improve the social sustainability of low-income households should target reducing the material footprints of more affluent households. Furthermore, the concept of what constitutes a decent life should be understood more universally than on the basis of standards of material consumption.
Material Footprint of Low-Income Households in Finland—Consequences for the Sustainability Debate
The article assesses the material footprints of households living on a minimum amount of social benefits in Finland and discusses the consequences in terms of ecological and social sustainability. The data were collected using interviews and a questionnaire on the consumption patterns of 18 single households. The results are compared to a study on households with varying income levels, to average consumption patterns and to decent minimum reference budgets. The low-income households have lower material footprints than average and most of the material footprints are below the socially sustainable level of consumption, which is based on decent minimum reference budgets. However, the amount of resources used by most of the households studied here is still at least double that required for ecological sustainability. The simultaneous existence of both deprivation and overconsumption requires measures from both politicians and companies to make consumption sustainable. For example, both adequate housing and economic mobility need to be addressed. Measures to improve the social sustainability of low-income households should target reducing the material footprints of more affluent households. Furthermore, the concept of what constitutes a decent life should be understood more universally than on the basis of standards of material consumption.
Material Footprint of Low-Income Households in Finland—Consequences for the Sustainability Debate
Satu Lähteenoja (author) / Kristiina Aalto (author) / Senja Laakso (author) / Tuuli Hirvilammi (author) / Michael Lettenmeier (author)
2012
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
consumption , household , social sustainability , income , sufficiency , ecological sustainability , natural resources , MIPS , material footprint , ecological backpack , Environmental effects of industries and plants , TD194-195 , Renewable energy sources , TJ807-830 , Environmental sciences , GE1-350
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Income Expectations in Sustainability of Subjective Perception of Households’ Wellbeing
| DOAJ | 2023
| DOAJ | 2020
Socioeconomic Sustainability for Low-Income Households: The Mediating Role of Financial Well-Being
| DOAJ | 2022
Universal Basic Income and Inclusive Capitalism: Consequences for Sustainability
| DOAJ | 2019
British Library Online Contents | 2000