A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Optimization of Traffic at Uncontrolled Intersections: Comparison of the Effectiveness of Roundabouts, Signal-Controlled Intersections, and Turbo-Roundabouts
This study focuses on optimizing traffic flow at uncontrolled intersections by comparing the effectiveness of different intersection types: roundabouts, signal-controlled intersections, and turbo-roundabouts. The purpose is to determine which type offers the best solution for enhancing traffic efficiency, reducing delays, and improving safety. The research employs simulation-based modeling to analyze traffic performance under varying traffic conditions. Critical parameters such as vehicle flow rate, average delay time, and capacity are used to assess the performance of each intersection type. The results indicate that turbo-roundabouts outperform conventional roundabouts and signal-controlled intersections in terms of both capacity and reduction in delays. The findings suggest that implementing turbo-roundabouts at high-traffic intersections can significantly improve traffic flow and reduce congestion. However, the effectiveness of each solution is context-dependent, with signal-controlled intersections still being advantageous under specific conditions, particularly in highly urbanized areas. This study provides valuable insights for transportation planners and engineers, highlighting the importance of intersection design in traffic optimization.
Optimization of Traffic at Uncontrolled Intersections: Comparison of the Effectiveness of Roundabouts, Signal-Controlled Intersections, and Turbo-Roundabouts
This study focuses on optimizing traffic flow at uncontrolled intersections by comparing the effectiveness of different intersection types: roundabouts, signal-controlled intersections, and turbo-roundabouts. The purpose is to determine which type offers the best solution for enhancing traffic efficiency, reducing delays, and improving safety. The research employs simulation-based modeling to analyze traffic performance under varying traffic conditions. Critical parameters such as vehicle flow rate, average delay time, and capacity are used to assess the performance of each intersection type. The results indicate that turbo-roundabouts outperform conventional roundabouts and signal-controlled intersections in terms of both capacity and reduction in delays. The findings suggest that implementing turbo-roundabouts at high-traffic intersections can significantly improve traffic flow and reduce congestion. However, the effectiveness of each solution is context-dependent, with signal-controlled intersections still being advantageous under specific conditions, particularly in highly urbanized areas. This study provides valuable insights for transportation planners and engineers, highlighting the importance of intersection design in traffic optimization.
Optimization of Traffic at Uncontrolled Intersections: Comparison of the Effectiveness of Roundabouts, Signal-Controlled Intersections, and Turbo-Roundabouts
Alica Kalašová (author) / Miloš Poliak (author) / Laura Škorvánková (author) / Peter Fabian (author)
2024
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Safety Effects of Converting Intersections to Roundabouts
British Library Online Contents | 2013
|Evaluating the Conversion of All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections into Roundabouts
British Library Online Contents | 2008
|Crash Analysis of Roundabouts at High-Speed Rural Intersections
British Library Online Contents | 2009
|Comparative Analysis of Compact Multilane Roundabouts and Turbo-Roundabouts
Online Contents | 2010
|Use of roundabouts as intersections in urban areas: a case study
British Library Online Contents | 2002