A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Should standard cube test specimens be replaced by test specimens taken from structures
Results obtained from investigations in which concrete strength was determined at same time on standard, job-stored, and core cylinder specimens; test results indicate trend that job-stored test specimens and drilled core cylinders tend to exhibit strength which is lower than that of standard test specimens; factors of strength level, curing procedure, type and dimensions of structure, type of cement, and compaction which cause differences in strength of concrete between structure and standard test specimens are discussed. (14609)
Should standard cube test specimens be replaced by test specimens taken from structures
Results obtained from investigations in which concrete strength was determined at same time on standard, job-stored, and core cylinder specimens; test results indicate trend that job-stored test specimens and drilled core cylinders tend to exhibit strength which is lower than that of standard test specimens; factors of strength level, curing procedure, type and dimensions of structure, type of cement, and compaction which cause differences in strength of concrete between structure and standard test specimens are discussed. (14609)
Should standard cube test specimens be replaced by test specimens taken from structures
Mater Constr, Mater Struct
Petersons, N. (author)
1968
11 pages
Article (Journal)
English
© Metadata Copyright Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
Should standard cube test specimens be replaced by test specimens taken from structures?
| Springer Verlag | 1968
Mechanics of failure of standard concrete test specimens
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1932
Homogeneous test specimens from gyratory compaction
| Online Contents | 2007