A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Summary of results of investigation made at six coal mines where representative methods of working Arley seam under typical natural conditions are practiced; at partially stowed machine faces, roof was more broken than at completely stowed hand faces; determining factors appeared to be higher speed of advance and less, effective stowing associated with machine mining. Before Manchester Geol and Min Soc. (See also - (discussion) n 3749 Nov 4 p 854-5; Instn Min Engrs -- Trans Nov 1932 p 57-69 (discussion) p 69-77; Iron and Coal Trades Rev v 125 n 3373 Oct 21 1932 p 614 and n 3374 Oct 28 p 663)
Summary of results of investigation made at six coal mines where representative methods of working Arley seam under typical natural conditions are practiced; at partially stowed machine faces, roof was more broken than at completely stowed hand faces; determining factors appeared to be higher speed of advance and less, effective stowing associated with machine mining. Before Manchester Geol and Min Soc. (See also - (discussion) n 3749 Nov 4 p 854-5; Instn Min Engrs -- Trans Nov 1932 p 57-69 (discussion) p 69-77; Iron and Coal Trades Rev v 125 n 3373 Oct 21 1932 p 614 and n 3374 Oct 28 p 663)
Longwall roof control in Arley seam
Colliery Guardian
Faulkner, R. (author)
Colliery Guardian ; 145
1932
4 pages
Article (Journal)
English
© Metadata Copyright Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
Engineering Index Backfile | 1932
|Engineering Index Backfile | 1931
|Roof control in longwall workings
Engineering Index Backfile | 1931
|Roof control on longwall faces
Engineering Index Backfile | 1929
|Roof control in longwall workings
Engineering Index Backfile | 1931
|