A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Two nondestructive impulse methods, namely, ultrasonic and sonic hammer methods for checking quality of concrete are compared with their advantages and disadvantages especially in relation to speeding up construction of prestressed concrete bridges.
Two nondestructive impulse methods, namely, ultrasonic and sonic hammer methods for checking quality of concrete are compared with their advantages and disadvantages especially in relation to speeding up construction of prestressed concrete bridges.
Impulse methods for controlling construction speed of prestressed concrete bridges
Am Concrete Inst -- J
Javor, T. (author)
1967
4 pages
Article (Journal)
English
© Metadata Copyright Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
Nondestructive evaluation of prestressed concrete bridges using impulse response
Tema Archive | 2003
|Prestressed concrete bridges : design and construction
UB Braunschweig | 2003
|Prestressed concrete bridges : design and construction
TIBKAT | 2003
|Cantilever construction of prestressed concrete bridges
Engineering Index Backfile | 1966
|Prestressed concrete bridges : design and construction
TIBKAT | 2012
|