A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Measurement of resistance to turbulent flow in 8 rough conduits of various cross sectional forms; analysis of results indicated that diameter of inscribed circle is better linear scale to use in Reynolds and relative roughness terms of Nikuradse and Colebrook-White resistance equations than hydraulic diameter, and relative efficiency of variety of ordinary conduit forms can be significantly expressed by dimensionless ratio of inscribed circle diameter over hydraulic diameter.
Measurement of resistance to turbulent flow in 8 rough conduits of various cross sectional forms; analysis of results indicated that diameter of inscribed circle is better linear scale to use in Reynolds and relative roughness terms of Nikuradse and Colebrook-White resistance equations than hydraulic diameter, and relative efficiency of variety of ordinary conduit forms can be significantly expressed by dimensionless ratio of inscribed circle diameter over hydraulic diameter.
Flow in noncircular conduits
ASCE -- Proc (J Hydraulics Div)
Malaika, J. (author)
1962
30 pages
Article (Journal)
English
© Metadata Copyright Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
ASCE | 2021
|Secondary Flow in Noncircular Conduits
ASCE | 2021
|Discussion of “Flow in Noncircular Conduits”
ASCE | 2021
|Erratum for “Flow in Noncircular Conduits”
ASCE | 2021
|Closure to “Flow in Noncircular Conduits”
ASCE | 2021
|