A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Prefabricated airfield and road surfacing membrane investigation -- Engineering tests, January 1956-December 1959
Laboratory and field tests were conducted on 4 membranes, vinyl-coated cotton duck (T1), vinyl-coated nylon (T13), and 2 neoprene-coated nylon (T12 and T14) membranes, to determine their suitability as dustproofing and waterproofing media when used with or without landing mats; results indicated that T12 performed best with and without landing mat; all membranes provided adequate dustproofing, but only T12 was considered waterproof beneath M8 mat for 700 coverages; sewn membrane panels were placed approximately 9 times faster than adhesive-bonded panels.
Prefabricated airfield and road surfacing membrane investigation -- Engineering tests, January 1956-December 1959
Laboratory and field tests were conducted on 4 membranes, vinyl-coated cotton duck (T1), vinyl-coated nylon (T13), and 2 neoprene-coated nylon (T12 and T14) membranes, to determine their suitability as dustproofing and waterproofing media when used with or without landing mats; results indicated that T12 performed best with and without landing mat; all membranes provided adequate dustproofing, but only T12 was considered waterproof beneath M8 mat for 700 coverages; sewn membrane panels were placed approximately 9 times faster than adhesive-bonded panels.
Prefabricated airfield and road surfacing membrane investigation -- Engineering tests, January 1956-December 1959
U S Waterways Experiment Station -- Tech Report
Tucker, S.G. (author)
1962
101 pages
Report
English
© Metadata Copyright Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
Concrete block surfacing for airfield pavements
British Library Online Contents | 1996
|Micro-Surfacing for Airfield Asphalt Pavements
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999
|ROAD SURFACING - Road surfacing guidance launch
Online Contents | 2013