A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
River water or cooling towers?
Theoretical gain of thermal efficiency due to use of river water at 50 deg. fahr., as compared with water artificially cooled to 75 deg., for condensing, is partly neutralized by difficulty of dealing efficiently with immense volume of steam at pressure of 1 in. of mercury (absolute); instead of 10 per cent, net gain in practice is 4 or 5 per cent. (See also Elec. Rev., vol. 100, no. 2564, Jan. 14, 1927, pp. 46-48, 1 fig.; brief translated abstract in Power Engr., vol. 22, no. 255, June 1927, p. 234.)
River water or cooling towers?
Theoretical gain of thermal efficiency due to use of river water at 50 deg. fahr., as compared with water artificially cooled to 75 deg., for condensing, is partly neutralized by difficulty of dealing efficiently with immense volume of steam at pressure of 1 in. of mercury (absolute); instead of 10 per cent, net gain in practice is 4 or 5 per cent. (See also Elec. Rev., vol. 100, no. 2564, Jan. 14, 1927, pp. 46-48, 1 fig.; brief translated abstract in Power Engr., vol. 22, no. 255, June 1927, p. 234.)
River water or cooling towers?
Genie Civil
Waite, J.N. (author) / Gueritte, T.J. (author)
Genie Civil ; 90
1927
2 pages
Article (Journal)
English
© Metadata Copyright Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
Cooling water by cooling towers
Engineering Index Backfile | 1940
|Ferro concrete water cooling towers
Engineering Index Backfile | 1930
|Water cooling towers will burn!
Engineering Index Backfile | 1956
|Tema Archive | 1972
|Water Treatment for Cooling Towers
British Library Online Contents | 1999
|