A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Airport capacity choice under airport-airline vertical arrangements
Highlights This study investigates airport-airline vertical arrangements on airport capacity. Capital cost savings lead to higher capacity. Vertical arrangements lead to higher profit for a profit-maximising airport. Vertical arrangements lead to higher welfare for a welfare-maximising airport. Win-win outcomes may be achieved without government intervention.
Abstract This study investigates the effects of airport-airline vertical arrangements on airport capacity choices under demand uncertainty. A multi-stage game is analysed, in which competing airlines contribute to capacity investments and share airport revenues. Our analytical results suggest that for a profit-maximising airport, such a vertical arrangement leads to higher capacity but may not increase its profit, whereas for a welfare-maximising airport, such an arrangement has no effect on capacity or welfare. Capital cost savings brought by airport-airline cooperation, if any, always lead to higher capacity, and to higher profit for a profit-maximising airport and higher welfare for a welfare-maximising airport. Numerical simulations reveal that win-win outcomes may be achieved for an airport and its airlines without government intervention.
Airport capacity choice under airport-airline vertical arrangements
Highlights This study investigates airport-airline vertical arrangements on airport capacity. Capital cost savings lead to higher capacity. Vertical arrangements lead to higher profit for a profit-maximising airport. Vertical arrangements lead to higher welfare for a welfare-maximising airport. Win-win outcomes may be achieved without government intervention.
Abstract This study investigates the effects of airport-airline vertical arrangements on airport capacity choices under demand uncertainty. A multi-stage game is analysed, in which competing airlines contribute to capacity investments and share airport revenues. Our analytical results suggest that for a profit-maximising airport, such a vertical arrangement leads to higher capacity but may not increase its profit, whereas for a welfare-maximising airport, such an arrangement has no effect on capacity or welfare. Capital cost savings brought by airport-airline cooperation, if any, always lead to higher capacity, and to higher profit for a profit-maximising airport and higher welfare for a welfare-maximising airport. Numerical simulations reveal that win-win outcomes may be achieved for an airport and its airlines without government intervention.
Airport capacity choice under airport-airline vertical arrangements
Xiao, Yibin (author) / Fu, Xiaowen (author) / Zhang, Anming (author)
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice ; 92 ; 298-309
2016-01-01
12 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Simulating airline operational responses to airport capacity constraints
Online Contents | 2014
|Simulating airline operational responses to airport capacity constraints
Elsevier | 2014
|Airport Choice in Multiple-Airport Regions
Online Contents | 1995
|Airport choice in a multiple airport region
Elsevier | 1987
|