A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Numerical study of fractured rock masses: Transverse isotropy vs. implicit joint-continuum models
Abstract Fractures prevail mechanical behavior of a rock mass and confer an overall anisotropic response. Engineering analyses in the elastic regime often use transverse isotropy to model fractured rock masses with a single fracture set. An alternative implicit joint-continuum model combines the mechanical response of the intact rock and fractures by adding their compliance matrices. It can accommodate multiple fracture sets and non-linear fracture response. While the transverse isotropic model is inadequate to model fractured rock media because of its inherent assumptions on the continuity for all stress components, the implicit joint-continuum model is verified against the exact solutions of internal stress distributions and displacement field. The analysis of strip foundations using the implicit joint continuum approach shows that the maximum settlement and tilt will take place when the fracture set strikes quasi-collinear with the strip direction (θJ ≈ ±15°) and the fracture dip angle is either βJ ≈ 40° ± 10° or βJ ≈ 140° ± 10°.
Numerical study of fractured rock masses: Transverse isotropy vs. implicit joint-continuum models
Abstract Fractures prevail mechanical behavior of a rock mass and confer an overall anisotropic response. Engineering analyses in the elastic regime often use transverse isotropy to model fractured rock masses with a single fracture set. An alternative implicit joint-continuum model combines the mechanical response of the intact rock and fractures by adding their compliance matrices. It can accommodate multiple fracture sets and non-linear fracture response. While the transverse isotropic model is inadequate to model fractured rock media because of its inherent assumptions on the continuity for all stress components, the implicit joint-continuum model is verified against the exact solutions of internal stress distributions and displacement field. The analysis of strip foundations using the implicit joint continuum approach shows that the maximum settlement and tilt will take place when the fracture set strikes quasi-collinear with the strip direction (θJ ≈ ±15°) and the fracture dip angle is either βJ ≈ 40° ± 10° or βJ ≈ 140° ± 10°.
Numerical study of fractured rock masses: Transverse isotropy vs. implicit joint-continuum models
Shin, Hosung (author) / Santamarina, J. Carlos (author)
2021-06-18
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Continuum modelling of fractured rock masses: Is it useful?
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
|A continuum analysis of the hydromechanical coupling in fractured rock masses
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
|Modelling of fractured rock masses
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
|A Semi-Continuum Model for Numerical Simulations of Mass Transport in 3-D Fractured Rock Masses
Online Contents | 2019
|A Semi-Continuum Model for Numerical Simulations of Mass Transport in 3-D Fractured Rock Masses
Online Contents | 2019
|