A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Beyond significant wave height: A new approach for validating spectral wave models
Abstract Wave data are required in many engineering applications. At locations where measured records are not available or are too short for design purposes, estimates of wave properties from numerical wave models are often used to characterise the expected wave climate. Typically, model predictions are validated against observations of the sea-state parameters, such as significant wave height, peak wave period, mean wave period and mean wave direction. However, while agreement between observed and predicted sea-state parameters can be good, in some cases the measured and predicted wave spectra can diverge significantly. In these circumstances, simple sea state parameters alone are not sufficient to describe the range of wave conditions that could arise at a given site. In this paper we present a new, alternative approach for assessing wave model performance by applying new parameterisation to the frequency wave spectrum. Seven parameters (significant wave height, peak frequency, peak energy density, squared Euclidean distance, skewness, kurtosis and mean width deviation) are used to better define the characteristics of unimodal wave spectra. Sensitivity tests are undertaken to analyse the performance and sensitivity of these parameters in identifying differences between observed and predicted wave spectra, using a range of idealised JONSWAP wave spectra. We demonstrate that comparing multiple parameters is a better method to distinguish differences between spectra than the results obtained using individual parameters in isolation. As such, application of two-dimensional validation matrices are proposed to provide a better, qualitative overview of the goodness of fit between observed and predicted wave spectra. The advantages of the new approach are demonstrated through validation of a hindcast spectral wave model at Hastings, southeast England. We believe that we have achieved our purpose here to start a discussion on alternative validation techniques that could be enhanced in the future.
Highlights We develop a new, more robust approach for validating spectral wave models. The new approach uses seven spectral wave parameters (SWPs) for model assessment. Comparing SWPs in parallel is better than comparing them individually. 2D validation matrices provide better overview of overall wave model performance.
Beyond significant wave height: A new approach for validating spectral wave models
Abstract Wave data are required in many engineering applications. At locations where measured records are not available or are too short for design purposes, estimates of wave properties from numerical wave models are often used to characterise the expected wave climate. Typically, model predictions are validated against observations of the sea-state parameters, such as significant wave height, peak wave period, mean wave period and mean wave direction. However, while agreement between observed and predicted sea-state parameters can be good, in some cases the measured and predicted wave spectra can diverge significantly. In these circumstances, simple sea state parameters alone are not sufficient to describe the range of wave conditions that could arise at a given site. In this paper we present a new, alternative approach for assessing wave model performance by applying new parameterisation to the frequency wave spectrum. Seven parameters (significant wave height, peak frequency, peak energy density, squared Euclidean distance, skewness, kurtosis and mean width deviation) are used to better define the characteristics of unimodal wave spectra. Sensitivity tests are undertaken to analyse the performance and sensitivity of these parameters in identifying differences between observed and predicted wave spectra, using a range of idealised JONSWAP wave spectra. We demonstrate that comparing multiple parameters is a better method to distinguish differences between spectra than the results obtained using individual parameters in isolation. As such, application of two-dimensional validation matrices are proposed to provide a better, qualitative overview of the goodness of fit between observed and predicted wave spectra. The advantages of the new approach are demonstrated through validation of a hindcast spectral wave model at Hastings, southeast England. We believe that we have achieved our purpose here to start a discussion on alternative validation techniques that could be enhanced in the future.
Highlights We develop a new, more robust approach for validating spectral wave models. The new approach uses seven spectral wave parameters (SWPs) for model assessment. Comparing SWPs in parallel is better than comparing them individually. 2D validation matrices provide better overview of overall wave model performance.
Beyond significant wave height: A new approach for validating spectral wave models
Dabbi, Edgar Peter (author) / Haigh, Ivan D. (author) / Lambkin, David (author) / Hernon, Jamie (author) / Williams, Jon J. (author) / Nicholls, Robert J. (author)
Coastal Engineering ; 100 ; 11-25
2015-03-19
15 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Wave spectrum , Validation , Wave model , UK
Beyond significant wave height: A new approach for validating spectral wave models
Online Contents | 2015
|Beyond significant wave height: A new approach for validating spectral wave models
British Library Online Contents | 2015
|DEPTH-LIMITED SIGNIFICANT WAVE HEIGHT: A SPECTRAL APPROACH
TIBKAT | 1982
|ENERGY DISSIPATION MODEL FOR COMPUTING TRANSFORMATION OF SPECTRAL SIGNIFICANT WAVE HEIGHT
Online Contents | 2010
|Modelling distributions of significant wave height
Online Contents | 2000
|