A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models
Abstract Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models for the purpose of predicting transient flow and dispersion phenomena is more demanding than validating RANS-based codes. Since the model output is no longer related to stationary or quasi-stationary boundary conditions, and since the model results are not meant to be used for predicting mean flow and dispersion patterns, an evaluation of the model based on mean results is not meaningful for most of the model-specific applications. A more sophisticated but also more complex validation approach based on statistically representative ensembles is required. By comparing frequency/probability distributions of flow and dispersion results with qualified reference data the reliability of complex models can be evaluated. Based on a careful comparison of FAST3D-CT simulation results with corresponding systematic wind tunnel data from the JU2003 experiments, an example for an application specific evaluation procedure for instantaneous puff dispersion modeling is given.
Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models
Abstract Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models for the purpose of predicting transient flow and dispersion phenomena is more demanding than validating RANS-based codes. Since the model output is no longer related to stationary or quasi-stationary boundary conditions, and since the model results are not meant to be used for predicting mean flow and dispersion patterns, an evaluation of the model based on mean results is not meaningful for most of the model-specific applications. A more sophisticated but also more complex validation approach based on statistically representative ensembles is required. By comparing frequency/probability distributions of flow and dispersion results with qualified reference data the reliability of complex models can be evaluated. Based on a careful comparison of FAST3D-CT simulation results with corresponding systematic wind tunnel data from the JU2003 experiments, an example for an application specific evaluation procedure for instantaneous puff dispersion modeling is given.
Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models
Harms, F. (author) / Leitl, B. (author) / Schatzmann, M. (author) / Patnaik, G. (author)
Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics ; 99 ; 289-295
2011-01-01
7 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models
| Online Contents | 2011
Validating land change models based on configuration disagreement
| Elsevier | 2019
On validating predictions of plant motion in coupled biomechanical-flow models
| Online Contents | 2015
On validating predictions of plant motion in coupled biomechanical-flow models
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2015
Validating Models Using 3D Microstructural Characterization
| British Library Online Contents | 2014