A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Empirical evidence on cruising for parking
Highlights ► We examine cruising for parking using a Dutch nation-wide sample of car trips. ► The average cruising time is 36 seconds per car trip. ► Cruising is shown to have a spatial and a time component. ► Cruising time depends positively on parking duration.
Abstract The literature on car cruising is dominated by theory. We examine cruising for parking using a nation-wide random sample of car trips. We exclude employer-provided and residential parking. We focus on the Netherlands, where levels of on-street and off-street parking prices are locally the same. We demonstrate then that due to this price setting the average cruising time in the Netherlands is only 36s per car trip. Furthermore, we show that cruising is not random. It is more common in (large) cities that receive more car trips, particularly for shopping and leisure activities. Cruising time increases with travel duration as well as with parking duration. Cruising has a distinctive pattern over the day with a peak in the morning, so the order of arrival is essential to parking. Because cruising has a spatial and time component, policies may be considered that reduce cruising time through flexible pricing of parking or improved information about vacant parking spaces.
Empirical evidence on cruising for parking
Highlights ► We examine cruising for parking using a Dutch nation-wide sample of car trips. ► The average cruising time is 36 seconds per car trip. ► Cruising is shown to have a spatial and a time component. ► Cruising time depends positively on parking duration.
Abstract The literature on car cruising is dominated by theory. We examine cruising for parking using a nation-wide random sample of car trips. We exclude employer-provided and residential parking. We focus on the Netherlands, where levels of on-street and off-street parking prices are locally the same. We demonstrate then that due to this price setting the average cruising time in the Netherlands is only 36s per car trip. Furthermore, we show that cruising is not random. It is more common in (large) cities that receive more car trips, particularly for shopping and leisure activities. Cruising time increases with travel duration as well as with parking duration. Cruising has a distinctive pattern over the day with a peak in the morning, so the order of arrival is essential to parking. Because cruising has a spatial and time component, policies may be considered that reduce cruising time through flexible pricing of parking or improved information about vacant parking spaces.
Empirical evidence on cruising for parking
van Ommeren, Jos N. (author) / Wentink, Derk (author) / Rietveld, Piet (author)
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice ; 46 ; 123-130
2011-09-07
8 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Empirical evidence on cruising for parking
Online Contents | 2012
|Elsevier | 2006
|Online Contents | 2006
|Analysis of parking cruising behaviour and parking location choice
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2020
|Comparison of probabilistic cruising-for-parking time estimation models
Elsevier | 2024
|