A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Measurement uncertainty of shear wave velocity: A case study of thirteen alluvium test sites in Taipei Basin
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8714-4888
Abstract Field seismic methods are widely applied to site investigations for seismic design. The most often used ones are cross-hole, down-hole, SCPT, suspension P–S logging, and surface wave methods. The choice of seismic methods has a variety of technical and cost considerations. However, the measurement uncertainty among resulting shear wave velocities by above methods are rarely statistically characterized with mathematical models and sound database in the literature, even though it is an important factor to consider before choosing a method. In this study, thirteen alluvium sites in Taipei Basin were chosen and carefully planned to simultaneously measure the velocity profiles using each of the five most common seismic methods with conventional shear wave triggering techniques. Using the data from the test and statistical models, the differences between seismic methods were quantified as the calibrated measurement uncertainty, which can be used as a reference for selecting an appropriate method for measuring shear wave velocity. Finally, the effect of measurement uncertainty on seismic site classification and simplified soil liquefaction potential evaluations based on shear wave velocity was investigated.
Highlights The variability of Vs measurements by five types of field seismic methods were investigated and characterized statistically. The relationship between the variability of V S and the depth of the soil layers is established. With the proposed calibration models, the V S measured by cross-hole method can be predicted from the ones by other seismic methods. The influences of the variability on seismic site classification and soil liquefaction potential evaluation are investigated.
Measurement uncertainty of shear wave velocity: A case study of thirteen alluvium test sites in Taipei Basin
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8714-4888
Abstract Field seismic methods are widely applied to site investigations for seismic design. The most often used ones are cross-hole, down-hole, SCPT, suspension P–S logging, and surface wave methods. The choice of seismic methods has a variety of technical and cost considerations. However, the measurement uncertainty among resulting shear wave velocities by above methods are rarely statistically characterized with mathematical models and sound database in the literature, even though it is an important factor to consider before choosing a method. In this study, thirteen alluvium sites in Taipei Basin were chosen and carefully planned to simultaneously measure the velocity profiles using each of the five most common seismic methods with conventional shear wave triggering techniques. Using the data from the test and statistical models, the differences between seismic methods were quantified as the calibrated measurement uncertainty, which can be used as a reference for selecting an appropriate method for measuring shear wave velocity. Finally, the effect of measurement uncertainty on seismic site classification and simplified soil liquefaction potential evaluations based on shear wave velocity was investigated.
Highlights The variability of Vs measurements by five types of field seismic methods were investigated and characterized statistically. The relationship between the variability of V S and the depth of the soil layers is established. With the proposed calibration models, the V S measured by cross-hole method can be predicted from the ones by other seismic methods. The influences of the variability on seismic site classification and soil liquefaction potential evaluation are investigated.
Measurement uncertainty of shear wave velocity: A case study of thirteen alluvium test sites in Taipei Basin
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8714-4888
Abstract Field seismic methods are widely applied to site investigations for seismic design. The most often used ones are cross-hole, down-hole, SCPT, suspension P–S logging, and surface wave methods. The choice of seismic methods has a variety of technical and cost considerations. However, the measurement uncertainty among resulting shear wave velocities by above methods are rarely statistically characterized with mathematical models and sound database in the literature, even though it is an important factor to consider before choosing a method. In this study, thirteen alluvium sites in Taipei Basin were chosen and carefully planned to simultaneously measure the velocity profiles using each of the five most common seismic methods with conventional shear wave triggering techniques. Using the data from the test and statistical models, the differences between seismic methods were quantified as the calibrated measurement uncertainty, which can be used as a reference for selecting an appropriate method for measuring shear wave velocity. Finally, the effect of measurement uncertainty on seismic site classification and simplified soil liquefaction potential evaluations based on shear wave velocity was investigated.
Highlights The variability of Vs measurements by five types of field seismic methods were investigated and characterized statistically. The relationship between the variability of V S and the depth of the soil layers is established. With the proposed calibration models, the V S measured by cross-hole method can be predicted from the ones by other seismic methods. The influences of the variability on seismic site classification and soil liquefaction potential evaluation are investigated.
Measurement uncertainty of shear wave velocity: A case study of thirteen alluvium test sites in Taipei Basin
Wang, Jiun-Shiang (author) / Hwang, Jin-Hung (author) / Lu, Chih-Chieh (author) / Deng, Yuan-Chang (author)
2022-02-07
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Shear-Wave Velocity Correlations for Puyallup River Alluvium
| British Library Online Contents | 2010
Transient Seismic Response of Buried Tunnels in Alluvium Sites
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
CAV site-effect assessment: A case study of Taipei Basin
| British Library Online Contents | 2018