A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
The damage investigation of inelastic SDOF structure under the mainshock–aftershock sequence-type ground motions
Abstract Structures located in seismically active regions may be subjected to mainshock–aftershock sequence-type ground motions, which are characterized by the presence of strong aftershock ground motions after the mainshock and separated by short intervals of time. This manuscript investigates the damage of inelastic SDOF structure with four hysteretic models and three response demand parameters. The relative intensity of the aftershock ground motion to the mainshock ground motion is defined, denoted by PGA as/PGA ms. The aftershock ground motions are scaled to have different levels of PGA as/PGA ms. The results indicate that the effect of aftershock on ductility demand is slight for PGA as/PGA ms≤0.5 and can be ignored in engineering practice. The aftershock ground motion has more significant influence on the normalized hysteretic energy and damage index than on ductility demand. The effect of aftershock ground motion with larger PGA as/PGA ms on the response demand is generally more obvious for non-degrading system than for degrading system.
Highlights This paper studies the effect of aftershock on the damage of inelastic SDOF structure. Aftershock ground motions are scaled to different relative intensity PGA as/PGA ms. Aftershock ground motion of PGA as/PGA ms≤0.5 has negligible effect on ductility demand. Aftershock has more obvious effects on hysteretic energy than on ductility demand.
The damage investigation of inelastic SDOF structure under the mainshock–aftershock sequence-type ground motions
Abstract Structures located in seismically active regions may be subjected to mainshock–aftershock sequence-type ground motions, which are characterized by the presence of strong aftershock ground motions after the mainshock and separated by short intervals of time. This manuscript investigates the damage of inelastic SDOF structure with four hysteretic models and three response demand parameters. The relative intensity of the aftershock ground motion to the mainshock ground motion is defined, denoted by PGA as/PGA ms. The aftershock ground motions are scaled to have different levels of PGA as/PGA ms. The results indicate that the effect of aftershock on ductility demand is slight for PGA as/PGA ms≤0.5 and can be ignored in engineering practice. The aftershock ground motion has more significant influence on the normalized hysteretic energy and damage index than on ductility demand. The effect of aftershock ground motion with larger PGA as/PGA ms on the response demand is generally more obvious for non-degrading system than for degrading system.
Highlights This paper studies the effect of aftershock on the damage of inelastic SDOF structure. Aftershock ground motions are scaled to different relative intensity PGA as/PGA ms. Aftershock ground motion of PGA as/PGA ms≤0.5 has negligible effect on ductility demand. Aftershock has more obvious effects on hysteretic energy than on ductility demand.
The damage investigation of inelastic SDOF structure under the mainshock–aftershock sequence-type ground motions
Zhai, Chang-Hai (author) / Wen, Wei-Ping (author) / Li, Shuang (author) / Chen, ZhiQiang (author) / Chang, Zhiwang (author) / Xie, Li-Li (author)
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering ; 59 ; 30-41
2014-01-07
12 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
British Library Online Contents | 2014
|Damage spectra for the mainshock–aftershock sequence-type ground motions
Elsevier | 2012
|Damage spectra for the mainshock–aftershock sequence-type ground motions
Online Contents | 2013
|