A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Arthropod diversity and ecological processes on green roofs in a semi-rural area of Argentina: Similarity to neighbor ground habitats and landscape effects
Highlights We found 388 arthropod species from all feeding groups on green roofs, and 614 on ground-level habitats. Species richness, abundance and predation rates were higher on ground-level habitats. Total richness and several feeding groups decreased with street cover in the landscape. On ground-level, herbivory increased with street cover and predation with grassland cover. Habitat area enhanced arthropods, and only some groups increased with plant richness.
Abstract Green roofs could mitigate the negative effects of urbanization by providing habitats for arthropods. However, more studies are necessary to understand if these new ecosystems can harbor similar numbers of species and levels of ecological processes than habitats at the ground-level. In 15 houses of 1–2 floors with extensive green roofs from a semi-rural area in Córdoba (central Argentina), we analyzed the species richness and abundance of arthropods on green roofs and their neighboring ground-level habitats and evaluated the influence of landscape composition (proportion of buildings, grasslands, and streets). We focus on feeding groups (herbivores, predators, omnivores, detritivores, parasitoids, and pollinators) and two ecological processes (herbivory and predation). Moreover, we tested two factors that may drive the communities on ground-level habitats and green roofs: habitat area and plant species richness. Species richness and abundance of arthropods (total and by feeding groups), and predation rates were significantly higher in ground-level habitats than on green roofs. Nevertheless, arthropod diversity on living roofs was striking, with almost 400 species from different feeding groups. Street cover in the landscape negatively affected total richness and several feeding groups. On ground-level habitats, herbivory increased with street cover and predation with grassland cover. The main factor driving arthropods in both green roofs and ground-level habitats was habitat area, whereas plant richness had a positive effect only in predators, detritivores, and omnivores. Our results reinforce the role of green roofs as habitat for arthropod species in semi-rural areas of Latin-American countries, where the evidence was so far lacking.
Arthropod diversity and ecological processes on green roofs in a semi-rural area of Argentina: Similarity to neighbor ground habitats and landscape effects
Highlights We found 388 arthropod species from all feeding groups on green roofs, and 614 on ground-level habitats. Species richness, abundance and predation rates were higher on ground-level habitats. Total richness and several feeding groups decreased with street cover in the landscape. On ground-level, herbivory increased with street cover and predation with grassland cover. Habitat area enhanced arthropods, and only some groups increased with plant richness.
Abstract Green roofs could mitigate the negative effects of urbanization by providing habitats for arthropods. However, more studies are necessary to understand if these new ecosystems can harbor similar numbers of species and levels of ecological processes than habitats at the ground-level. In 15 houses of 1–2 floors with extensive green roofs from a semi-rural area in Córdoba (central Argentina), we analyzed the species richness and abundance of arthropods on green roofs and their neighboring ground-level habitats and evaluated the influence of landscape composition (proportion of buildings, grasslands, and streets). We focus on feeding groups (herbivores, predators, omnivores, detritivores, parasitoids, and pollinators) and two ecological processes (herbivory and predation). Moreover, we tested two factors that may drive the communities on ground-level habitats and green roofs: habitat area and plant species richness. Species richness and abundance of arthropods (total and by feeding groups), and predation rates were significantly higher in ground-level habitats than on green roofs. Nevertheless, arthropod diversity on living roofs was striking, with almost 400 species from different feeding groups. Street cover in the landscape negatively affected total richness and several feeding groups. On ground-level habitats, herbivory increased with street cover and predation with grassland cover. The main factor driving arthropods in both green roofs and ground-level habitats was habitat area, whereas plant richness had a positive effect only in predators, detritivores, and omnivores. Our results reinforce the role of green roofs as habitat for arthropod species in semi-rural areas of Latin-American countries, where the evidence was so far lacking.
Arthropod diversity and ecological processes on green roofs in a semi-rural area of Argentina: Similarity to neighbor ground habitats and landscape effects
Sánchez Domínguez, María Virginia (author) / González, Ezequiel (author) / Fabián, Diego (author) / Salvo, Adriana (author) / Fenoglio, María Silvina (author)
2020-03-26
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Insect species composition and diversity on intensive green roofs and adjacent level-ground habitats
| Online Contents | 2010
Green Roofs - Urban Habitats for Ground-Nesting Birds and Plants
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2010
Green Roofs in Sustainable Landscape Design
| Emerald Group Publishing | 2009