A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Shaking table tests on soil retaining walls reinforced by polymeric strips
Abstract The seismic behavior of reinforced soil retaining walls with polymeric strips is examined. A series of 1-g shaking table tests were employed on 80 cm high reinforced-soil wall models. Also, some uniaxial tensile and pullout tests were performed in reduced-scale models to determine the best material to be used instead of polymeric strips in models. The effect of the length of reinforcement, number of steps and shape of the reinforcement arrangement (zigzag vs. parallel) on the failure mode, the wall displacement, and the acceleration amplification factor are investigated. Findings suggest that walls built with extensible reinforcement were flexible and the internal failure mechanism in the reinforced zone for these walls involved a bulging mode. The parallel implementation of reinforcements is more favorable as it decreases the displacements more than 50% before failure compared to the zig-zag arrangement. Also, wall displacement was reduced with a decrease and increase in the reinforcement length at bottom and top layers, respectively and this improved the wall behavior. Therefore, reducing the reinforcement length at the bottom of the wall without increasing the length of upper layers is not recommended as it can noticeably increase wall displacement from 1.2 to 7 times under different waves.
Shaking table tests on soil retaining walls reinforced by polymeric strips
Abstract The seismic behavior of reinforced soil retaining walls with polymeric strips is examined. A series of 1-g shaking table tests were employed on 80 cm high reinforced-soil wall models. Also, some uniaxial tensile and pullout tests were performed in reduced-scale models to determine the best material to be used instead of polymeric strips in models. The effect of the length of reinforcement, number of steps and shape of the reinforcement arrangement (zigzag vs. parallel) on the failure mode, the wall displacement, and the acceleration amplification factor are investigated. Findings suggest that walls built with extensible reinforcement were flexible and the internal failure mechanism in the reinforced zone for these walls involved a bulging mode. The parallel implementation of reinforcements is more favorable as it decreases the displacements more than 50% before failure compared to the zig-zag arrangement. Also, wall displacement was reduced with a decrease and increase in the reinforcement length at bottom and top layers, respectively and this improved the wall behavior. Therefore, reducing the reinforcement length at the bottom of the wall without increasing the length of upper layers is not recommended as it can noticeably increase wall displacement from 1.2 to 7 times under different waves.
Shaking table tests on soil retaining walls reinforced by polymeric strips
Komak Panah, A. (author) / Yazdi, M. (author) / Ghalandarzadeh, A. (author)
Geotextiles and Geomembranes ; 43 ; 148-161
2015-01-04
14 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Shaking table tests on soil retaining walls reinforced by polymeric strips
Online Contents | 2015
|Shaking table tests on soil retaining walls reinforced by polymeric strips
Tema Archive | 2015
|Shaking table tests on geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
|Numerical modeling of shaking table tests on reinforced soil retaining walls
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006
|REDUCED SCALE SHAKING TABLE TESTS ON GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED SOIL RETAINING WALLS
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2008
|