A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
An experimental evaluation of geocomposite-reinforced soil sections
Highlights The correlation between standard and modified California bearing ratio. Enhanced behavior of soil-aggregate systems by geocomposite and geogrid. Geocomposite reinforcement had multi-function in interlocking and separation. Decrement in the California bearing ratio by mold modification. Lateral fixation increased the strain mobilization in geocomposite and geogrid.
Abstract The present study aims to investigate the performance of soil-aggregate sections reinforced by three types of geosynthetics. The main focus of this research was on a geocomposite material comprised of a geogrid and a nonwoven geotextile. Along with investigating this reinforcement, its components (i.e., geogrid and nonwoven geotextile) were also studied individually to make a comparison between their functionalities in soil-aggregate systems. Two sandy soils, one of which was a case study, were chosen as the subgrade layer in this research. The California Bearing Ratio (CBR) was the index to examine the strength of specimens. The scale effect of the conventional CBR mold, as well as geosynthetics anchorage, were investigated through fabricating a modified CBR mold. Strain analysis was also carried out by utilizing some foil strain gauges to assess the strain mobilized in the geosynthetics in various reinforced sections. In the presence of both geocomposite and geogrid, load-penetration responses of the specimens enhanced significantly, while the geotextile inclusion effect was in a negative way. Improved functionalities of reinforcing materials were seen in the modified mold.
An experimental evaluation of geocomposite-reinforced soil sections
Highlights The correlation between standard and modified California bearing ratio. Enhanced behavior of soil-aggregate systems by geocomposite and geogrid. Geocomposite reinforcement had multi-function in interlocking and separation. Decrement in the California bearing ratio by mold modification. Lateral fixation increased the strain mobilization in geocomposite and geogrid.
Abstract The present study aims to investigate the performance of soil-aggregate sections reinforced by three types of geosynthetics. The main focus of this research was on a geocomposite material comprised of a geogrid and a nonwoven geotextile. Along with investigating this reinforcement, its components (i.e., geogrid and nonwoven geotextile) were also studied individually to make a comparison between their functionalities in soil-aggregate systems. Two sandy soils, one of which was a case study, were chosen as the subgrade layer in this research. The California Bearing Ratio (CBR) was the index to examine the strength of specimens. The scale effect of the conventional CBR mold, as well as geosynthetics anchorage, were investigated through fabricating a modified CBR mold. Strain analysis was also carried out by utilizing some foil strain gauges to assess the strain mobilized in the geosynthetics in various reinforced sections. In the presence of both geocomposite and geogrid, load-penetration responses of the specimens enhanced significantly, while the geotextile inclusion effect was in a negative way. Improved functionalities of reinforcing materials were seen in the modified mold.
An experimental evaluation of geocomposite-reinforced soil sections
Abdi-Goudarzi, S. (author) / Ziaie-Moayed, R. (author) / Nazeri, A. (author)
2021-11-03
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Bearing Capacity of Square Footing on Cohesive Soil Reinforced with Geocomposite
| Springer Verlag | 2022
Bearing Capacity of a Model Square Footing on Geocomposite Reinforced Layered Soil
| Springer Verlag | 2024