A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Bending performance of 3D re-entrant and hexagonal metamaterials
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5720-6649
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5094-7145
Abstract Auxetic structures have theoretically superior bending resistance that was previously inaccessible. Compared with the planar two-dimensional (2D) auxetic structures, the three-dimensional (3D) counterparts may exhibit auxetic behavior in multiple directions. Recently, increasing studies have been devoted to studying the mechanical properties of 3D auxetic structures. In this paper, two 3D honeycomb structures were proposed, namely 3D re-entrant honeycomb and 3D hexagonal honeycomb. Subsequently, the mechanical properties, deformation modes, and deformation mechanisms of these two honeycomb structures under three-point bending were investigated experimentally and numerically. Compared with the 3D non-auxetic hexagonal honeycomb, the 3D auxetic re-entrant honeycomb exhibits higher ductility and fracture resistance. In addition, unlike the conventional honeycomb structure, the mid-span section of the 3D auxetic honeycomb exhibits a trapezoidal deformation mode under bending. Finally, the influence of the number of unit cells and geometric parameters on the mechanical properties of the 3D honeycomb structure were systematically studied by parametric analysis. The excellent bending performance provides a basis for the application of auxetic honeycomb in the fields of biomedicine, soft robots, and buffer devices.
Graphical abstract Display Omitted
Highlights Two 3D honeycomb structures, namely 3D auxetic honeycomb and 3D non-auxetic honeycomb, were designed and fabricated. The mechanical properties, failure modes, and deformation mechanism of two specimens are investigated under three-point bending. Compared with the 3D non-auxetic honeycomb, the 3D auxetic honeycomb exhibits better ductility and a trapezoidal deformation pattern at midspan.
Bending performance of 3D re-entrant and hexagonal metamaterials
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5720-6649
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5094-7145
Abstract Auxetic structures have theoretically superior bending resistance that was previously inaccessible. Compared with the planar two-dimensional (2D) auxetic structures, the three-dimensional (3D) counterparts may exhibit auxetic behavior in multiple directions. Recently, increasing studies have been devoted to studying the mechanical properties of 3D auxetic structures. In this paper, two 3D honeycomb structures were proposed, namely 3D re-entrant honeycomb and 3D hexagonal honeycomb. Subsequently, the mechanical properties, deformation modes, and deformation mechanisms of these two honeycomb structures under three-point bending were investigated experimentally and numerically. Compared with the 3D non-auxetic hexagonal honeycomb, the 3D auxetic re-entrant honeycomb exhibits higher ductility and fracture resistance. In addition, unlike the conventional honeycomb structure, the mid-span section of the 3D auxetic honeycomb exhibits a trapezoidal deformation mode under bending. Finally, the influence of the number of unit cells and geometric parameters on the mechanical properties of the 3D honeycomb structure were systematically studied by parametric analysis. The excellent bending performance provides a basis for the application of auxetic honeycomb in the fields of biomedicine, soft robots, and buffer devices.
Graphical abstract Display Omitted
Highlights Two 3D honeycomb structures, namely 3D auxetic honeycomb and 3D non-auxetic honeycomb, were designed and fabricated. The mechanical properties, failure modes, and deformation mechanism of two specimens are investigated under three-point bending. Compared with the 3D non-auxetic honeycomb, the 3D auxetic honeycomb exhibits better ductility and a trapezoidal deformation pattern at midspan.
Bending performance of 3D re-entrant and hexagonal metamaterials
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5720-6649
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5094-7145
Abstract Auxetic structures have theoretically superior bending resistance that was previously inaccessible. Compared with the planar two-dimensional (2D) auxetic structures, the three-dimensional (3D) counterparts may exhibit auxetic behavior in multiple directions. Recently, increasing studies have been devoted to studying the mechanical properties of 3D auxetic structures. In this paper, two 3D honeycomb structures were proposed, namely 3D re-entrant honeycomb and 3D hexagonal honeycomb. Subsequently, the mechanical properties, deformation modes, and deformation mechanisms of these two honeycomb structures under three-point bending were investigated experimentally and numerically. Compared with the 3D non-auxetic hexagonal honeycomb, the 3D auxetic re-entrant honeycomb exhibits higher ductility and fracture resistance. In addition, unlike the conventional honeycomb structure, the mid-span section of the 3D auxetic honeycomb exhibits a trapezoidal deformation mode under bending. Finally, the influence of the number of unit cells and geometric parameters on the mechanical properties of the 3D honeycomb structure were systematically studied by parametric analysis. The excellent bending performance provides a basis for the application of auxetic honeycomb in the fields of biomedicine, soft robots, and buffer devices.
Graphical abstract Display Omitted
Highlights Two 3D honeycomb structures, namely 3D auxetic honeycomb and 3D non-auxetic honeycomb, were designed and fabricated. The mechanical properties, failure modes, and deformation mechanism of two specimens are investigated under three-point bending. Compared with the 3D non-auxetic honeycomb, the 3D auxetic honeycomb exhibits better ductility and a trapezoidal deformation pattern at midspan.
Bending performance of 3D re-entrant and hexagonal metamaterials
Zhang, Xue Gang (author) / Jiang, Wei (author) / Zhang, Yi (author) / Han, Dong (author) / Luo, Chen (author) / Zhang, Xiang Yu (author) / Hao, Jian (author) / Xie, Yi Min (author) / Ren, Xin (author)
Thin-Walled Structures ; 188
2023-05-02
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
| British Library Online Contents | 2017