A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Ranking the substantive problems in the Dutch Cost–Benefit Analysis practice
Highlights ► Perceptions from 86 key participants in the Dutch CBA practice concerning substantive problems with CBA. ► All the key participants are interviewed and 74 filled in an additional questionnaire. ► ‘Problems with the estimation of the non-monetized project effects’ most important problem cluster. ► Broad consensus among different groups in Dutch CBA practice regarding perception on seriousness of problem clusters. ► Large part of the substantive problems mentioned are non-specific CBA problems.
Abstract This paper investigates the perceptions of key participants in the Dutch Cost–Benefit Analysis (CBA) practice regarding substantive problems when appraising spatial-infrastructure projects with CBA. Two research methods were applied. Firstly, 86 key participants in the Dutch CBA practice were interviewed in-depth in order to obtain an overview and a ranking of perceived substantive problems with CBA in the Netherlands. Secondly, the people interviewed were also asked to fill in a written questionnaire in which they were asked to rank the substantive problems once again, in order to improve the validity of the ranking; 74 of the participants completed this questionnaire. The most important conclusions of this paper are, firstly, that key participants in the Dutch CBA practice consider ‘problems with the estimation of the non-monetized project effects’ as the most important substantive problem cluster and ‘problems with monetizing project effects’ as the second most important substantive problem cluster. Secondly, key participants in the Dutch CBA practice consider the ‘problem analysis’ in a CBA to be a very important substantive problem. Thirdly, there is, in a broad sense, consensus among the different groups in the Dutch CBA practice concerning their perception of the seriousness of problem clusters and the way they rank the problem clusters. Fourthly, a large part of the substantive problems mentioned by the key participants in the Dutch CBA practice are non-specific CBA problems.
Ranking the substantive problems in the Dutch Cost–Benefit Analysis practice
Highlights ► Perceptions from 86 key participants in the Dutch CBA practice concerning substantive problems with CBA. ► All the key participants are interviewed and 74 filled in an additional questionnaire. ► ‘Problems with the estimation of the non-monetized project effects’ most important problem cluster. ► Broad consensus among different groups in Dutch CBA practice regarding perception on seriousness of problem clusters. ► Large part of the substantive problems mentioned are non-specific CBA problems.
Abstract This paper investigates the perceptions of key participants in the Dutch Cost–Benefit Analysis (CBA) practice regarding substantive problems when appraising spatial-infrastructure projects with CBA. Two research methods were applied. Firstly, 86 key participants in the Dutch CBA practice were interviewed in-depth in order to obtain an overview and a ranking of perceived substantive problems with CBA in the Netherlands. Secondly, the people interviewed were also asked to fill in a written questionnaire in which they were asked to rank the substantive problems once again, in order to improve the validity of the ranking; 74 of the participants completed this questionnaire. The most important conclusions of this paper are, firstly, that key participants in the Dutch CBA practice consider ‘problems with the estimation of the non-monetized project effects’ as the most important substantive problem cluster and ‘problems with monetizing project effects’ as the second most important substantive problem cluster. Secondly, key participants in the Dutch CBA practice consider the ‘problem analysis’ in a CBA to be a very important substantive problem. Thirdly, there is, in a broad sense, consensus among the different groups in the Dutch CBA practice concerning their perception of the seriousness of problem clusters and the way they rank the problem clusters. Fourthly, a large part of the substantive problems mentioned by the key participants in the Dutch CBA practice are non-specific CBA problems.
Ranking the substantive problems in the Dutch Cost–Benefit Analysis practice
Mouter, Niek (author) / Annema, Jan Anne (author) / van Wee, Bert (author)
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice ; 49 ; 241-255
2013-01-03
15 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Ranking the substantive problems in the Dutch Cost–Benefit Analysis practice
| Online Contents | 2013
Dutch politicians’ attitudes towards Cost-Benefit Analysis
| Elsevier | 2016
Dutch politicians’ attitudes towards Cost-Benefit Analysis
| Online Contents | 2017
Dutch politicians’ use of cost–benefit analysis
| Online Contents | 2016