A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Is the green inequality overestimated? Quality reevaluation of green space accessibility
Abstract Although urban green space (UGS) is an important factor in improving the well-being of residents, the problem of green injustice has been proven to be prevalent. Balancing the quantity distribution of UGS is an important way to solve the problem, but the effect is declining owing to many reasons. The general lack of evaluation of UGS quality in accessibility model leads to the insufficient understanding of real inequality and the inability to excavate strategies from the level of quality. Accordingly, this article first established an evaluation system for the serviceability of UGS (including size, outerconnectivity, inner-connectivity, diversity, eco-serviceability, and compactness). Based on the comprehensive floating catchment area method, the spatial distribution patterns and inequality differences of UGS quantity and quality accessibility under three traffic modes are compared. The results show that evaluating the quantity inequality of UGS may lead to overestimation of real inequality, and other functional advantages can offset the quantitative disadvantages. The government-led quality improvement intervention and the policy of enhancing residents' transportation capacity can alleviate green inequality. The finding confirms the significance of serviceability in improving green equity and provides guidance for government leaders and researchers on the development of UGS in the future.
Highlights The measurement framework of quality accessibility of green space and its inequality was constructed. The measurement of a single quantitative dimension of green accessibility will lead to an overestimation of the real green inequality. The difference of quantity and quality accessibility of green space comes from the difference between spatial heterogeneity and social differentiation. High-density cities can alleviate green inequality by optimizing other functions of green space and making up for the quantitative short boards.
Is the green inequality overestimated? Quality reevaluation of green space accessibility
Abstract Although urban green space (UGS) is an important factor in improving the well-being of residents, the problem of green injustice has been proven to be prevalent. Balancing the quantity distribution of UGS is an important way to solve the problem, but the effect is declining owing to many reasons. The general lack of evaluation of UGS quality in accessibility model leads to the insufficient understanding of real inequality and the inability to excavate strategies from the level of quality. Accordingly, this article first established an evaluation system for the serviceability of UGS (including size, outerconnectivity, inner-connectivity, diversity, eco-serviceability, and compactness). Based on the comprehensive floating catchment area method, the spatial distribution patterns and inequality differences of UGS quantity and quality accessibility under three traffic modes are compared. The results show that evaluating the quantity inequality of UGS may lead to overestimation of real inequality, and other functional advantages can offset the quantitative disadvantages. The government-led quality improvement intervention and the policy of enhancing residents' transportation capacity can alleviate green inequality. The finding confirms the significance of serviceability in improving green equity and provides guidance for government leaders and researchers on the development of UGS in the future.
Highlights The measurement framework of quality accessibility of green space and its inequality was constructed. The measurement of a single quantitative dimension of green accessibility will lead to an overestimation of the real green inequality. The difference of quantity and quality accessibility of green space comes from the difference between spatial heterogeneity and social differentiation. High-density cities can alleviate green inequality by optimizing other functions of green space and making up for the quantitative short boards.
Is the green inequality overestimated? Quality reevaluation of green space accessibility
Wu, Jiayu (author) / Peng, Yisong (author) / Liu, Ping (author) / Weng, Yubing (author) / Lin, Jian (author)
Cities ; 130
2022-07-05
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Accessibility on Campus Green Space in University
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2014
|Accessibility on Campus Green Space in University
Trans Tech Publications | 2014
|Green space, health inequality and pregnancy
Online Contents | 2012
|Green space, health inequality and pregnancy
Elsevier | 2011
|