A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A critical perspective on policies for informal settlements in Portugal
Abstract While informal settlements in Portugal are not a recent phenomenon, planning and housing policy responses and results have been inconsistent. In 2012, the Amadora Municipality, within the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, resurrected the PER (Special Rehousing Programme), which was first launched in 1993 to remove informal settlements and rehouse inhabitants. This paper offers a critical analysis of the objectives, practices and results of the programme in Amadora and, particularly, regarding Bairro 6 de Maio, where most people were evicted without being relocated. It will discuss how informal settlement policies have been applied in Portugal over the past century and assess the New National Housing Policy, showing that integrated, effective policies regarding informal settlements are still lacking. The findings will suggest a change of the approach in addressing the phenomenon in order to guarantee the right to housing and to the city for inhabitants.
Highlights Informal settlements are still a housing solution for families in Portugal. Informal settlements policies in Portugal have been inconsistent. The destruction of informal settlements expose population to vulnerability. The New National Housing Policy (NNHP) does not assess informal settlements reality. Specific policies and funding for informal settlements in Portugal need to be included in NNHP.
A critical perspective on policies for informal settlements in Portugal
Abstract While informal settlements in Portugal are not a recent phenomenon, planning and housing policy responses and results have been inconsistent. In 2012, the Amadora Municipality, within the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, resurrected the PER (Special Rehousing Programme), which was first launched in 1993 to remove informal settlements and rehouse inhabitants. This paper offers a critical analysis of the objectives, practices and results of the programme in Amadora and, particularly, regarding Bairro 6 de Maio, where most people were evicted without being relocated. It will discuss how informal settlement policies have been applied in Portugal over the past century and assess the New National Housing Policy, showing that integrated, effective policies regarding informal settlements are still lacking. The findings will suggest a change of the approach in addressing the phenomenon in order to guarantee the right to housing and to the city for inhabitants.
Highlights Informal settlements are still a housing solution for families in Portugal. Informal settlements policies in Portugal have been inconsistent. The destruction of informal settlements expose population to vulnerability. The New National Housing Policy (NNHP) does not assess informal settlements reality. Specific policies and funding for informal settlements in Portugal need to be included in NNHP.
A critical perspective on policies for informal settlements in Portugal
Tarsi, Elena (author)
Cities ; 107
2020-09-16
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
New Policies For The Development Of Informal Settlements
| TIBKAT | 2020
Disaster-induced disruption of policies for informal urban settlements
| Elsevier | 2024
Transforming informal settlements to sustainable settlements
British Library Online Contents | 2002
A critical Lefebvrian perspective on planning in relation to informal settlements in South Africa
| BASE | 2021
A critical Lefebvrian perspective on planning in relation to informal settlements in South Africa
| DOAJ | 2021