A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Scorecards for sustainable local governments
Highlights A framework to evaluate the performance municipalities is suggested. ‘Governance’ is added to the TBL perspectives to assess local sustainability. An illustrative municipal scorecard is applied to Lisbon, Portugal. Innovative performance descriptors are provided to operationalize the criteria. The scorecards may help to align the goals of governments with the goals of citizens.
Abstract The current paper addresses the issue of performance measurement and benchmarking in local government. It briefly reviews some relevant international experiences and categorizes the existing assessment tools according to their general features. The authors argue that more than the benchmarking results themselves it is the evaluation process that matters. Furthermore, it is suggested that focusing only on effectiveness (e.g. ensuring the availability of certain public services) or efficiency (e.g. achieving good economic performance), is no longer consistent with the challenges that local decision-makers are now facing. Based on this, a conceptual model for benchmarking the “sustainability” of local governments is proposed. The illustrative municipal scorecard is presented for the city of Lisbon. The results show that using a comprehensive approach and a set of simple and carefully selected quantitative and qualitative indicators may empower citizens to act as “armchair auditors” and encourage local governments to realign their objectives.
Scorecards for sustainable local governments
Highlights A framework to evaluate the performance municipalities is suggested. ‘Governance’ is added to the TBL perspectives to assess local sustainability. An illustrative municipal scorecard is applied to Lisbon, Portugal. Innovative performance descriptors are provided to operationalize the criteria. The scorecards may help to align the goals of governments with the goals of citizens.
Abstract The current paper addresses the issue of performance measurement and benchmarking in local government. It briefly reviews some relevant international experiences and categorizes the existing assessment tools according to their general features. The authors argue that more than the benchmarking results themselves it is the evaluation process that matters. Furthermore, it is suggested that focusing only on effectiveness (e.g. ensuring the availability of certain public services) or efficiency (e.g. achieving good economic performance), is no longer consistent with the challenges that local decision-makers are now facing. Based on this, a conceptual model for benchmarking the “sustainability” of local governments is proposed. The illustrative municipal scorecard is presented for the city of Lisbon. The results show that using a comprehensive approach and a set of simple and carefully selected quantitative and qualitative indicators may empower citizens to act as “armchair auditors” and encourage local governments to realign their objectives.
Scorecards for sustainable local governments
Cruz, Nuno Ferreira da (author) / Marques, Rui Cunha (author)
Cities ; 39 ; 165-170
2014-01-02
6 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Scorecards for sustainable local governments
Online Contents | 2014
|British Library Online Contents | 2006
|Organizational networks and sustainable urban water practices in US local governments
DOAJ | 2022
|Dueling Scorecards: How Two Colleges Utilize the Popular Planning Method
British Library Online Contents | 2009
|British Library Online Contents | 2000
|