A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Comparison of intake of nicotine from environmental tobacco smoke between nose and mouth breathers
AbstractTwo experiments were carried out in order to investigate nicotine intake through passive smoking. In the first study, carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) and serum cotinine were found to increase to a similar extent in seven subjects breathing through the nose only and in another seven subjects breathing through the mouth only during exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Similarly, no significant difference was found in urinary excretion of nicotine and cotinine over a period of 72 hours, although nicotine and cotinine excretion tended to be slightly higher after inhalation through the nose only. In the second study, nicotine was measured in four subjects who held mainstream or sidestream smoke in the mouth without inhaling. Cotinine levels in serum and amounts of nicotine and cotinine excreted in the urine were low compared with those measured in the breathing study. Nicotine from sidestream smoke, however, is more effectively absorbed by the oral mucosa than nicotine from mainstream smoke. The data suggest that nicotine intake from passive smoking largely takes place in the bronchial tree and that nicotine absorption via the nasal or the oral mucosa is only of minor significance.
Comparison of intake of nicotine from environmental tobacco smoke between nose and mouth breathers
AbstractTwo experiments were carried out in order to investigate nicotine intake through passive smoking. In the first study, carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) and serum cotinine were found to increase to a similar extent in seven subjects breathing through the nose only and in another seven subjects breathing through the mouth only during exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Similarly, no significant difference was found in urinary excretion of nicotine and cotinine over a period of 72 hours, although nicotine and cotinine excretion tended to be slightly higher after inhalation through the nose only. In the second study, nicotine was measured in four subjects who held mainstream or sidestream smoke in the mouth without inhaling. Cotinine levels in serum and amounts of nicotine and cotinine excreted in the urine were low compared with those measured in the breathing study. Nicotine from sidestream smoke, however, is more effectively absorbed by the oral mucosa than nicotine from mainstream smoke. The data suggest that nicotine intake from passive smoking largely takes place in the bronchial tree and that nicotine absorption via the nasal or the oral mucosa is only of minor significance.
Comparison of intake of nicotine from environmental tobacco smoke between nose and mouth breathers
Jarczyk, L. (author) / Scherer, G. (author) / von Maltzan, C. (author) / Luu, H.T. (author) / Adlkofer, F. (author)
Environmental International ; 15 ; 35-40
1989-05-09
6 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
| Elsevier | 2018
| Wiley | 2000
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005