A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Abstract The 2016 centennial of Jane Jacobs's birth was an opportunity for scholars and pundits to reflect on the legacy of The Death and Life of Great American Cities and the author's other works and activism. Such reflections naturally reflected on her enduring appeal and readership, but also sought to find shortcomings. Among the critics, and even some otherwise admiring biographers, was a theme that while Jacobs was keen to observe the importance of “eyes on the street” and other street-scaled phenomena, she was weak on such overarching structural concerns as racism, power, and capital. From such charges arose claims that Jacobs was race-blind and a neoliberal, accusations made more dramatic in the context of the polarizing rhetoric of the 2016 US presidential election, Brexit, and other ideological divisions. By examining Jacobs's ideas about the freedom of the city; segregation and discrimination; public space and social capital; neighborhood organization and self-government; and her rejection of the “Plantation mentality,” this paper challenges those claims and shows Jacobs as an important theorist of ethics in the city, which she described as an “ecosystem” of “physical-economic-ethical processes” ideally characterized by “mutual support.”
Highlights Some biographers have mistakenly described Jacobs as race-blind and a neoliberal. Jacobs wrote at length against racism, housing discrimination, and redlining. Jacobs was a pioneering theorist of gentrification and an activist against it. Rejecting libertarianism, Jacobs advocated community organizing and mutual support. Jacobs's writing and activism was a precedent for today's progressive social thinkers.
Abstract The 2016 centennial of Jane Jacobs's birth was an opportunity for scholars and pundits to reflect on the legacy of The Death and Life of Great American Cities and the author's other works and activism. Such reflections naturally reflected on her enduring appeal and readership, but also sought to find shortcomings. Among the critics, and even some otherwise admiring biographers, was a theme that while Jacobs was keen to observe the importance of “eyes on the street” and other street-scaled phenomena, she was weak on such overarching structural concerns as racism, power, and capital. From such charges arose claims that Jacobs was race-blind and a neoliberal, accusations made more dramatic in the context of the polarizing rhetoric of the 2016 US presidential election, Brexit, and other ideological divisions. By examining Jacobs's ideas about the freedom of the city; segregation and discrimination; public space and social capital; neighborhood organization and self-government; and her rejection of the “Plantation mentality,” this paper challenges those claims and shows Jacobs as an important theorist of ethics in the city, which she described as an “ecosystem” of “physical-economic-ethical processes” ideally characterized by “mutual support.”
Highlights Some biographers have mistakenly described Jacobs as race-blind and a neoliberal. Jacobs wrote at length against racism, housing discrimination, and redlining. Jacobs was a pioneering theorist of gentrification and an activist against it. Rejecting libertarianism, Jacobs advocated community organizing and mutual support. Jacobs's writing and activism was a precedent for today's progressive social thinkers.
Jane Jacobs's urban ethics
Laurence, Peter L. (author)
Cities ; 91 ; 29-38
2018-02-28
10 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Jane Jacobs , Ethics , Just city , Urban design , Urban renewal , Urban redevelopment , Urban economics , Urban policy , Urban planning , Neighborhood organization , Urban politics , Urban governance , Public space , Segregation , Redlining , Desegregation , Racism , Gentrification , Public-private partnerships , Social capital
Revisiting Jane Jacobs’s Urban Complexity in Global Sustainability City Discourse
DOAJ | 2021
Revisiting Jane Jacobs’s Urban Complexity in Global Sustainability City Discourse
DOAJ | 2021
|Jane Jacobs (1916-2006) - Jane Jacobs's Urban Village: Well Preserved or Cast Adrift?
Online Contents | 2007
|Jane Jacobs's first city : learning from Scranton, Pennsylvania
TIBKAT | 2021
|Neighbourhood park vitality potential: From Jane Jacobs's theory to evaluation model
BASE | 2020
|