A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Interpretation of static and dynamic Young’s moduli and Poisson’s ratio of granular assemblies under shearing
Abstract Young’s modulus () and Poisson’s ratio () of granular assemblies are two essential mechanical properties. Measurements based on stress–strain relationships gives static values ( and ) while stress wave measurements give dynamic values ( and ). This study adopts the discrete element method (DEM) to investigate the evolution of and regarding various loading probes under drained conditions at selected strain levels from the original loading. The DEM results reveal that and or and are not always equivalent for face-centred cubic (FCC) packings and random/disordered packings (RDP). When samples are beyond the initial elastic range, either increasing friction coefficient or conducting unloading leads to a recovery of elasticity where and are equivalent during the entire axial range while and are equivalent at initial elastic range. The stress-induced fabric anisotropy is found to have negligible effect on the comparisons between and or and under various loading probes. Microscopic investigations signify that mean contact force ratio and fraction of slip contacts are key parameters to evaluate elasticity. Besides, the supplementary laboratory tests are conducted using spherical glass beads in which measured from the small-amplitude cyclic loadings after creep is equivalent to at the pre-peak strain range.
Interpretation of static and dynamic Young’s moduli and Poisson’s ratio of granular assemblies under shearing
Abstract Young’s modulus () and Poisson’s ratio () of granular assemblies are two essential mechanical properties. Measurements based on stress–strain relationships gives static values ( and ) while stress wave measurements give dynamic values ( and ). This study adopts the discrete element method (DEM) to investigate the evolution of and regarding various loading probes under drained conditions at selected strain levels from the original loading. The DEM results reveal that and or and are not always equivalent for face-centred cubic (FCC) packings and random/disordered packings (RDP). When samples are beyond the initial elastic range, either increasing friction coefficient or conducting unloading leads to a recovery of elasticity where and are equivalent during the entire axial range while and are equivalent at initial elastic range. The stress-induced fabric anisotropy is found to have negligible effect on the comparisons between and or and under various loading probes. Microscopic investigations signify that mean contact force ratio and fraction of slip contacts are key parameters to evaluate elasticity. Besides, the supplementary laboratory tests are conducted using spherical glass beads in which measured from the small-amplitude cyclic loadings after creep is equivalent to at the pre-peak strain range.
Interpretation of static and dynamic Young’s moduli and Poisson’s ratio of granular assemblies under shearing
Li, Yang (author) / Otsubo, Masahide (author) / Kuwano, Reiko (author)
2021-11-19
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Dynamic vs. static Young's moduli
British Library Online Contents | 1993
|Anisotropy of Young's Modulus and Poisson's Ratio in Diamond
British Library Online Contents | 1992
|Novel structure with negative Poisson’s ratio and enhanced Young’s modulus
British Library Online Contents | 2016
|