A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Neoliberal urban development and the polarization of urban governance
Abstract This paper explores the impact of neoliberal urban planning on urban governance, using Dar es Salam as a case study. Drawing on planning literature and the concepts of ‘state-capitalist,’ ‘coercive monopoly,’ and ‘de jure collusion’, the paper examines how the desire to spur economic growth has undermined planning practice and city management. By combining literature, observations and interviews with practitioners and academics, the paper reveals that neoliberal planning promotes elite interests, over the needs of the poor, limiting their right to the city. Planning is reduced to a mere exercise of market facilitation, with little to no social impact. Lack of social resonance, the paper notes, suggests a misplaced priority and a parochial preoccupation among city authorities. To create equitable urban spaces and development, the paper argues for a shift toward inclusive planning approaches in the cities of the Global South.
Highlights State capitalist, coercive monopoly and de jure collusion are employed to analyse neoliberal planning and urban governance. Neoliberal urban planning promotes elite interests, leaving little room for inclusive governance. Planning is reduced to a mere exercise of facilitation, with little to no social impact. Inclusive planning approaches are needed for local needs contextualization and effective project management.
Neoliberal urban development and the polarization of urban governance
Abstract This paper explores the impact of neoliberal urban planning on urban governance, using Dar es Salam as a case study. Drawing on planning literature and the concepts of ‘state-capitalist,’ ‘coercive monopoly,’ and ‘de jure collusion’, the paper examines how the desire to spur economic growth has undermined planning practice and city management. By combining literature, observations and interviews with practitioners and academics, the paper reveals that neoliberal planning promotes elite interests, over the needs of the poor, limiting their right to the city. Planning is reduced to a mere exercise of market facilitation, with little to no social impact. Lack of social resonance, the paper notes, suggests a misplaced priority and a parochial preoccupation among city authorities. To create equitable urban spaces and development, the paper argues for a shift toward inclusive planning approaches in the cities of the Global South.
Highlights State capitalist, coercive monopoly and de jure collusion are employed to analyse neoliberal planning and urban governance. Neoliberal urban planning promotes elite interests, leaving little room for inclusive governance. Planning is reduced to a mere exercise of facilitation, with little to no social impact. Inclusive planning approaches are needed for local needs contextualization and effective project management.
Neoliberal urban development and the polarization of urban governance
Baffoe, Gideon (author)
Cities ; 143
2023-09-16
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Consent to Neoliberal Hegemony through Coercive Urban Environmental Governance
| Online Contents | 2013
Post-neoliberal nature? community water governance in peri-urban Cochabamba, Bolivia
| BASE | 2012
Post-neoliberal nature? community water governance in peri-urban Cochabamba, Bolivia
| BASE | 2012
Beyond the Alternative Complex. The London Urban Food Strategy and Neoliberal Governance
| BASE | 2015