A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Correlation between pore structure, compressive strength and thermal conductivity of porous metakaolin geopolymer
Highlights Thermal conductivity of neat geopolymer was affected greatly by MK/AA ratio. Combined foam and surfactant generated smaller and narrower pore size distribution. Effect of surfactant as pore stabilizer was prominent at low foaming agent content. Pore volume and connectivity govern the thermal conductivity of porous geopolymer. Geopolymer foam could be applied as Class II – structural and insulating materials.
Abstract This paper investigates the effect of mixing parameters (that are, alkali concentration, AA ratio, and MK/AA ratio) on the thermal conductivity of metakaolin geopolymers. The combination effect of foaming agent (H2O2) and surfactant (Tween 80) on the physical properties, compressive strength, and pore characteristic was also elucidated. Results showed that metakaolin geopolymer with maximum compressive strength of 33 MPa, bulk density of 1680 kg/m3, porosity of 18% and thermal conductivity of 0.40 W/mK were achieved with alkali concentration of 10 M, AA ratio of 1.0 and MK/AA ratio of 0.8. Gradation analysis demonstrated that AA ratio was the strength determining factor. Whilst, thermal conductivity was dependent on the MK/AA ratio. Adding H2O2 and surfactant produced geopolymer foam with acceptable compressive strength (0.4–6 MPa). The geopolymer foam had bulk density of 471–1212 kg/m3, porosity of 36–86% and thermal conductivity of 0.11–0.30 W/mK. Pore structure, size, and distribution were governed by H2O2 and surfactant dosages that have a great impact on the compressive strength. Narrower pore distribution and smaller pore diameter were achieved when both foaming agent and surfactant were used instead of foaming agent alone. The pore size and distribution varied to a greater extent with varying H2O2 contents. Surfactant illustrated distinct pore stabilizing effect at low H2O2 (<0.75 wt%) which diminished at high H2O2 content. In terms of thermal conductivity, even with increasing porosity at high H2O2 and surfactant content, the thermal conductivity did not show substantial reduction due to the interconnected pores as a result of pore coalescence.
Correlation between pore structure, compressive strength and thermal conductivity of porous metakaolin geopolymer
Highlights Thermal conductivity of neat geopolymer was affected greatly by MK/AA ratio. Combined foam and surfactant generated smaller and narrower pore size distribution. Effect of surfactant as pore stabilizer was prominent at low foaming agent content. Pore volume and connectivity govern the thermal conductivity of porous geopolymer. Geopolymer foam could be applied as Class II – structural and insulating materials.
Abstract This paper investigates the effect of mixing parameters (that are, alkali concentration, AA ratio, and MK/AA ratio) on the thermal conductivity of metakaolin geopolymers. The combination effect of foaming agent (H2O2) and surfactant (Tween 80) on the physical properties, compressive strength, and pore characteristic was also elucidated. Results showed that metakaolin geopolymer with maximum compressive strength of 33 MPa, bulk density of 1680 kg/m3, porosity of 18% and thermal conductivity of 0.40 W/mK were achieved with alkali concentration of 10 M, AA ratio of 1.0 and MK/AA ratio of 0.8. Gradation analysis demonstrated that AA ratio was the strength determining factor. Whilst, thermal conductivity was dependent on the MK/AA ratio. Adding H2O2 and surfactant produced geopolymer foam with acceptable compressive strength (0.4–6 MPa). The geopolymer foam had bulk density of 471–1212 kg/m3, porosity of 36–86% and thermal conductivity of 0.11–0.30 W/mK. Pore structure, size, and distribution were governed by H2O2 and surfactant dosages that have a great impact on the compressive strength. Narrower pore distribution and smaller pore diameter were achieved when both foaming agent and surfactant were used instead of foaming agent alone. The pore size and distribution varied to a greater extent with varying H2O2 contents. Surfactant illustrated distinct pore stabilizing effect at low H2O2 (<0.75 wt%) which diminished at high H2O2 content. In terms of thermal conductivity, even with increasing porosity at high H2O2 and surfactant content, the thermal conductivity did not show substantial reduction due to the interconnected pores as a result of pore coalescence.
Correlation between pore structure, compressive strength and thermal conductivity of porous metakaolin geopolymer
Jaya, Nur Ain (author) / Yun-Ming, Liew (author) / Cheng-Yong, Heah (author) / Abdullah, Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri (author) / Hussin, Kamarudin (author)
2020-03-01
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Geopolymer , Metakaolin , Porous , Pore , Foam , Surfactant
| British Library Online Contents | 2016
Metakaolin-Based Porous Geopolymer with Aluminium Powder
| Tema Archive | 2014
| DOAJ | 2023
Metakaolin-Based Porous Geopolymer with Aluminium Powder
| British Library Online Contents | 2014