A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Smallholders’ livelihoods in the presence of commercial farms in central Kenya
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2284-8032
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0418-1270
Abstract We study smallholder households livelihood profiles in central Kenya in an area characterized by the presence of many large commercial farms. We surveyed 375 smallholder households, compared them according to three categories (employed, contract farmers, households non-engaged with commercial farms), and constructed a livelihood index. The results show that contract farmers and households employed on farms are only a small fraction of all smallholders. Employed and non-employed households show little difference in overall livelihood profiles. Results suggest that employment on large commercial farms is mainly a coping strategy for younger households or in times of need. Contract farmers were found only in a specific location and had better access to irrigation water and higher livestock holdings. Comparison with earlier data shows the persistence of precarious livelihood levels and household strategies aiming at diversification of activities, with little evolution over the last 20 years despite the presence of commercial farms. Overall, there is little evidence that the proximity to the commercial farms offers a way out of poverty for nearby smallholder farmers.
Highlights Employment on large farms is mainly a coping strategy during times of need. Livelihood assets of employed households differed little from those not employed. Contract farmers were found to be a minority and had more productive assets. Longitudinal comparison shows the persistence of precarious livelihood levels.
Smallholders’ livelihoods in the presence of commercial farms in central Kenya
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2284-8032
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0418-1270
Abstract We study smallholder households livelihood profiles in central Kenya in an area characterized by the presence of many large commercial farms. We surveyed 375 smallholder households, compared them according to three categories (employed, contract farmers, households non-engaged with commercial farms), and constructed a livelihood index. The results show that contract farmers and households employed on farms are only a small fraction of all smallholders. Employed and non-employed households show little difference in overall livelihood profiles. Results suggest that employment on large commercial farms is mainly a coping strategy for younger households or in times of need. Contract farmers were found only in a specific location and had better access to irrigation water and higher livestock holdings. Comparison with earlier data shows the persistence of precarious livelihood levels and household strategies aiming at diversification of activities, with little evolution over the last 20 years despite the presence of commercial farms. Overall, there is little evidence that the proximity to the commercial farms offers a way out of poverty for nearby smallholder farmers.
Highlights Employment on large farms is mainly a coping strategy during times of need. Livelihood assets of employed households differed little from those not employed. Contract farmers were found to be a minority and had more productive assets. Longitudinal comparison shows the persistence of precarious livelihood levels.
Smallholders’ livelihoods in the presence of commercial farms in central Kenya
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2284-8032
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0418-1270
Abstract We study smallholder households livelihood profiles in central Kenya in an area characterized by the presence of many large commercial farms. We surveyed 375 smallholder households, compared them according to three categories (employed, contract farmers, households non-engaged with commercial farms), and constructed a livelihood index. The results show that contract farmers and households employed on farms are only a small fraction of all smallholders. Employed and non-employed households show little difference in overall livelihood profiles. Results suggest that employment on large commercial farms is mainly a coping strategy for younger households or in times of need. Contract farmers were found only in a specific location and had better access to irrigation water and higher livestock holdings. Comparison with earlier data shows the persistence of precarious livelihood levels and household strategies aiming at diversification of activities, with little evolution over the last 20 years despite the presence of commercial farms. Overall, there is little evidence that the proximity to the commercial farms offers a way out of poverty for nearby smallholder farmers.
Highlights Employment on large farms is mainly a coping strategy during times of need. Livelihood assets of employed households differed little from those not employed. Contract farmers were found to be a minority and had more productive assets. Longitudinal comparison shows the persistence of precarious livelihood levels.
Smallholders’ livelihoods in the presence of commercial farms in central Kenya
Giger, Markus (author) / Reys, Aurélien (author) / Anseeuw, Ward (author) / Mutea, Emily (author) / Kiteme, Boniface (author)
Journal of Rural Studies ; 96 ; 343-357
2022-11-02
15 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Commercial Horticulture by Kenyan Smallholders
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999
Anthropogenic fires and local livelihoods at Chyulu Hills, Kenya
| Elsevier | 2014
Anthropogenic fires and local livelihoods at Chyulu Hills, Kenya
| Online Contents | 2014