A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Passively enhanced VIV responses of side-by-side cylinders at moderate Reynolds number
Abstract Stationary upstream cylinders were used to enhance the response of vortex-induced vibration (VIV) of side-by-side (SBS) cylinders at Reynolds number Re = 1000. A modified direct-forcing immersed boundary (DFIB) with a large eddy simulation (LES) technique was employed to get the numerical solution. The VIV responses and VIVACE (vortex-induced vibration for aquatic clean energy) efficiency were investigated for various reduced velocities () at a constant mass-damping (). Furthermore, the influence of diameter () and spacing () of stationary upstream cylinders on the enhancement of amplitude response and VIVACE efficiency were analysed. The optimal upstream cylinder diameter and spacing were = 0.4 - 0.6 and 0.4. Within these ranges, the enhancement of amplitude response and efficiency was observed for 5.0, while the decrease in amplitude response and efficiency for = 4.0 – 4.5 was minimized.
Highlights A modified DFIB with LES technique was employed to perform VIV simulation of multiple cylinders. Stationary upstream cylinders were used to enhance the amplitude response and efficiency of VIVACE. The optimal diameter and spacing of stationary upstream cylinders were proposed.
Passively enhanced VIV responses of side-by-side cylinders at moderate Reynolds number
Abstract Stationary upstream cylinders were used to enhance the response of vortex-induced vibration (VIV) of side-by-side (SBS) cylinders at Reynolds number Re = 1000. A modified direct-forcing immersed boundary (DFIB) with a large eddy simulation (LES) technique was employed to get the numerical solution. The VIV responses and VIVACE (vortex-induced vibration for aquatic clean energy) efficiency were investigated for various reduced velocities () at a constant mass-damping (). Furthermore, the influence of diameter () and spacing () of stationary upstream cylinders on the enhancement of amplitude response and VIVACE efficiency were analysed. The optimal upstream cylinder diameter and spacing were = 0.4 - 0.6 and 0.4. Within these ranges, the enhancement of amplitude response and efficiency was observed for 5.0, while the decrease in amplitude response and efficiency for = 4.0 – 4.5 was minimized.
Highlights A modified DFIB with LES technique was employed to perform VIV simulation of multiple cylinders. Stationary upstream cylinders were used to enhance the amplitude response and efficiency of VIVACE. The optimal diameter and spacing of stationary upstream cylinders were proposed.
Passively enhanced VIV responses of side-by-side cylinders at moderate Reynolds number
Irawan, Yosua Heru (author) / Raza, Syed Ahmad (author) / Chern, Ming-Jyh (author)
Applied Ocean Research ; 138
2023-07-13
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2008
|