A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Long-term urban aerosol simulation versus routine particulate matter observations
AbstractThe ability of chemistry-transport models (CTMs) to accurately simulate particulate matter in urban areas is still to be demonstrated. This study presents a statistical evaluation of the performances of a mesoscale aerosol CTM over the Paris area, calculated over a long time period. Model simulations are compared to measured particulate matter PM10 and PM2.5 levels at monitoring ground stations. In summer, the PM10 daily mean levels are fairly well predicted by the model at all stations with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.67, relatively low biases (<2.5μgm−3) and normalized errors (<27%). The relatively uniform negative biases suggest that the background PM10 levels are underestimated. In winter, discrepancies between the model and observations are more important, in particular at urban sites where several erroneous peaks are simulated. Consequently, the correlation coefficient drops down to 0.59 at urban sites and PM10 values are overestimated by about 10μgm−3 with normalized errors exceeding 55%. We assume that discrepancies between simulated and observed PM levels are due to (i) TEOM (tapered element oscillating microbalance) measurement underestimation (35% in winter) caused by the evaporation of ammonium-nitrate, (ii) the underprediction of the model vertical mixing over the urban heat island and (iii) possible overestimation of local PM emissions. We use corrections for the urban boundary layer height and we subtract ammonium-nitrate from model PM10 concentrations. These modifications significantly improve the comparison statistics at urban sites in winter: the mean bias (<2μgm−3) and normalized error (<30%) are reduced, while the correlation coefficient increased to 0.64. However, the overestimation at urban sites is inconsistent with the underestimation of PM10 background concentrations. The analysis of the total model biases at urban sites reveals that the underprediction of PM10 background levels is largely compensated by their local overprediction due to the overestimation of anthropogenic emissions.
Long-term urban aerosol simulation versus routine particulate matter observations
AbstractThe ability of chemistry-transport models (CTMs) to accurately simulate particulate matter in urban areas is still to be demonstrated. This study presents a statistical evaluation of the performances of a mesoscale aerosol CTM over the Paris area, calculated over a long time period. Model simulations are compared to measured particulate matter PM10 and PM2.5 levels at monitoring ground stations. In summer, the PM10 daily mean levels are fairly well predicted by the model at all stations with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.67, relatively low biases (<2.5μgm−3) and normalized errors (<27%). The relatively uniform negative biases suggest that the background PM10 levels are underestimated. In winter, discrepancies between the model and observations are more important, in particular at urban sites where several erroneous peaks are simulated. Consequently, the correlation coefficient drops down to 0.59 at urban sites and PM10 values are overestimated by about 10μgm−3 with normalized errors exceeding 55%. We assume that discrepancies between simulated and observed PM levels are due to (i) TEOM (tapered element oscillating microbalance) measurement underestimation (35% in winter) caused by the evaporation of ammonium-nitrate, (ii) the underprediction of the model vertical mixing over the urban heat island and (iii) possible overestimation of local PM emissions. We use corrections for the urban boundary layer height and we subtract ammonium-nitrate from model PM10 concentrations. These modifications significantly improve the comparison statistics at urban sites in winter: the mean bias (<2μgm−3) and normalized error (<30%) are reduced, while the correlation coefficient increased to 0.64. However, the overestimation at urban sites is inconsistent with the underestimation of PM10 background concentrations. The analysis of the total model biases at urban sites reveals that the underprediction of PM10 background levels is largely compensated by their local overprediction due to the overestimation of anthropogenic emissions.
Long-term urban aerosol simulation versus routine particulate matter observations
Hodzic, A. (author) / Vautard, R. (author) / Bessagnet, B. (author) / Lattuati, M. (author) / Moreto, F. (author)
Atmospheric Environment ; 39 ; 5851-5864
2005-06-13
14 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Long-term assessment of particulate matter using CHIMERE model
| Elsevier | 2007
Long-term particulate matter exposure: Attributing health effects to individual PM components
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2015
| HENRY – Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute (BAW) | 2019