A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A study of the characteristics of dynamic incoming flow directions of different airflows and their influence on wind comfort
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5325-6788
Abstract Studies on the dynamic characteristics and comfort evaluation of natural and mechanical wind have been extensively conducted over the past two decades. However, in these contributions, varying wind directions were not considered. In this study, we systematically analysed different airflows from the perspective of the wind azimuth by using statistical analysis, power spectral analysis, wavelet analysis and chaos analysis. Several concepts are newly defined, such as the wind azimuth fluctuation rate (WAFR), the wind azimuth power spectral exponent (β a value) and the dimensionless parameter of the phase space curve (δ a value). The results show that the standard deviations (SDs) of the wind azimuth, WAFR, and β a values of typical natural wind are typically larger than those of mechanical wind, while the δ a value is lower. The differences in the direction characteristics between natural and mechanical wind highly agree with those in the velocity characteristics. To determine how the direction influences wind comfort, seventeen human subjects were invited to participate in a mixed experiment and exposed to five types of airflow. The results show that true natural wind was preferred, which may be due to the frequently changing direction. The findings also reveal that both the velocity and direction characteristics significantly influence wind comfort evaluations. By understanding the dynamic wind direction characteristics of airflows, this paper may provide new insights into further studies on characteristics, comfort assessments and the application of dynamic wind field in indoor built environments.
Highlights Typical tools for analysing wind velocity can also be used for direction. Natural wind direction varies more randomly than simulated natural wind. The incoming flow direction of oscillating wind is dynamic. The comfort study found that natural wind is preferred over directly supplied wind. Wind direction and velocity both play dominant roles in wind comfort evaluation.
A study of the characteristics of dynamic incoming flow directions of different airflows and their influence on wind comfort
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5325-6788
Abstract Studies on the dynamic characteristics and comfort evaluation of natural and mechanical wind have been extensively conducted over the past two decades. However, in these contributions, varying wind directions were not considered. In this study, we systematically analysed different airflows from the perspective of the wind azimuth by using statistical analysis, power spectral analysis, wavelet analysis and chaos analysis. Several concepts are newly defined, such as the wind azimuth fluctuation rate (WAFR), the wind azimuth power spectral exponent (β a value) and the dimensionless parameter of the phase space curve (δ a value). The results show that the standard deviations (SDs) of the wind azimuth, WAFR, and β a values of typical natural wind are typically larger than those of mechanical wind, while the δ a value is lower. The differences in the direction characteristics between natural and mechanical wind highly agree with those in the velocity characteristics. To determine how the direction influences wind comfort, seventeen human subjects were invited to participate in a mixed experiment and exposed to five types of airflow. The results show that true natural wind was preferred, which may be due to the frequently changing direction. The findings also reveal that both the velocity and direction characteristics significantly influence wind comfort evaluations. By understanding the dynamic wind direction characteristics of airflows, this paper may provide new insights into further studies on characteristics, comfort assessments and the application of dynamic wind field in indoor built environments.
Highlights Typical tools for analysing wind velocity can also be used for direction. Natural wind direction varies more randomly than simulated natural wind. The incoming flow direction of oscillating wind is dynamic. The comfort study found that natural wind is preferred over directly supplied wind. Wind direction and velocity both play dominant roles in wind comfort evaluation.
A study of the characteristics of dynamic incoming flow directions of different airflows and their influence on wind comfort
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5325-6788
Abstract Studies on the dynamic characteristics and comfort evaluation of natural and mechanical wind have been extensively conducted over the past two decades. However, in these contributions, varying wind directions were not considered. In this study, we systematically analysed different airflows from the perspective of the wind azimuth by using statistical analysis, power spectral analysis, wavelet analysis and chaos analysis. Several concepts are newly defined, such as the wind azimuth fluctuation rate (WAFR), the wind azimuth power spectral exponent (β a value) and the dimensionless parameter of the phase space curve (δ a value). The results show that the standard deviations (SDs) of the wind azimuth, WAFR, and β a values of typical natural wind are typically larger than those of mechanical wind, while the δ a value is lower. The differences in the direction characteristics between natural and mechanical wind highly agree with those in the velocity characteristics. To determine how the direction influences wind comfort, seventeen human subjects were invited to participate in a mixed experiment and exposed to five types of airflow. The results show that true natural wind was preferred, which may be due to the frequently changing direction. The findings also reveal that both the velocity and direction characteristics significantly influence wind comfort evaluations. By understanding the dynamic wind direction characteristics of airflows, this paper may provide new insights into further studies on characteristics, comfort assessments and the application of dynamic wind field in indoor built environments.
Highlights Typical tools for analysing wind velocity can also be used for direction. Natural wind direction varies more randomly than simulated natural wind. The incoming flow direction of oscillating wind is dynamic. The comfort study found that natural wind is preferred over directly supplied wind. Wind direction and velocity both play dominant roles in wind comfort evaluation.
A study of the characteristics of dynamic incoming flow directions of different airflows and their influence on wind comfort
Xie, Zuoyu (author) / Xie, Yongxin (author) / Cao, Bin (author) / Zhu, Yingxin (author)
Building and Environment ; 245
2023-09-18
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Spatial Distribution of Dynamic Characteristics of Fan Airflows and Their Impact on Thermal Comfort
| DOAJ | 2025
Dynamic characteristics and comfort assessment of airflows in indoor environments: A review
| British Library Online Contents | 2015
Dynamic characteristics and comfort assessment of airflows in indoor environments: A review
| British Library Online Contents | 2015