A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Brash ice macroporosity and piece size distribution in ship channels
Abstract Merchant vessels' performance on brash ice plays an important role in navigation in fast ice conditions in Northern Baltic ports. Among many parameters, the piece size distribution and macroporosity of the brash ice influence the accuracy of the model simulations of ship performance in brash ice. These properties also govern the brash ice accumulation and consolidation in ship channels. The current work presents analyses of macroporosity and piece size distribution from three full-scale brash ice channels investigated during winters 2020–21 and 2021–22. The results provide insights into brash ice macroporosity and piece size distribution. Smaller brash ice pieces exhibited higher porosity. On each measured cross-section, the average macroporosity ranged from 1.4% to 23%, with standard deviations of 3.8% and 16%, respectively. Porosity variations were observed in relation to equivalent brash ice thickness, the number of ship passages, and cumulative freezing air temperatures. Total porosity and the channel's brash ice porosity initially increased with breaking events and then stabilized at approximately 23% and 30%, respectively, after 9 passages. In contrast, side ridge porosity increased initially (up to 23%) and subsequently decreased. The initial total, brash ice and side ridge maximal porosities after the breaking event were estimated equal to 25%, 35% and 30%, respectively. The first two channels, which were navigated a total of 9 and 10 times, had an average degree of brash ice consolidation equal to 0.84 and 0.76, and an average degree of side ridge consolidation equal to 1.1 and 1.0, respectively. The third channel, characterized by frequent navigation, exhibited a consolidation degree of 0.82 for brash ice and 1.35 in the side ridges. The average vertical piece size across all cross-sections ranged from 0.28 m to 0.52 m with standard deviations of 0.16 m and 0.25 m. The average horizontal piece size ranged from 0.33 m to 0.4 m with standard deviations between 0.2 m and 0.34 m. The horizontal piece size distribution of brash ice was best described by the probability density function of a three-parameter lognormal distribution.
Highlights In the two less frequently navigated channels, the average porosities ranged from 1.4% to 23%. The more frequently navigated channel exhibited average porosities ranging from 8% to 21%. Total, brash ice, and side ridge porosities increased with increasing the corresponding thicknesses. Brash ice piece sizes ranged from 0.06 to 1.9 m, with average vertical and horizontal sizes up to 0.52 and 0.40 m. The distribution of horizontal piece sizes followed a three-parameter lognormal probability density function.
Brash ice macroporosity and piece size distribution in ship channels
Abstract Merchant vessels' performance on brash ice plays an important role in navigation in fast ice conditions in Northern Baltic ports. Among many parameters, the piece size distribution and macroporosity of the brash ice influence the accuracy of the model simulations of ship performance in brash ice. These properties also govern the brash ice accumulation and consolidation in ship channels. The current work presents analyses of macroporosity and piece size distribution from three full-scale brash ice channels investigated during winters 2020–21 and 2021–22. The results provide insights into brash ice macroporosity and piece size distribution. Smaller brash ice pieces exhibited higher porosity. On each measured cross-section, the average macroporosity ranged from 1.4% to 23%, with standard deviations of 3.8% and 16%, respectively. Porosity variations were observed in relation to equivalent brash ice thickness, the number of ship passages, and cumulative freezing air temperatures. Total porosity and the channel's brash ice porosity initially increased with breaking events and then stabilized at approximately 23% and 30%, respectively, after 9 passages. In contrast, side ridge porosity increased initially (up to 23%) and subsequently decreased. The initial total, brash ice and side ridge maximal porosities after the breaking event were estimated equal to 25%, 35% and 30%, respectively. The first two channels, which were navigated a total of 9 and 10 times, had an average degree of brash ice consolidation equal to 0.84 and 0.76, and an average degree of side ridge consolidation equal to 1.1 and 1.0, respectively. The third channel, characterized by frequent navigation, exhibited a consolidation degree of 0.82 for brash ice and 1.35 in the side ridges. The average vertical piece size across all cross-sections ranged from 0.28 m to 0.52 m with standard deviations of 0.16 m and 0.25 m. The average horizontal piece size ranged from 0.33 m to 0.4 m with standard deviations between 0.2 m and 0.34 m. The horizontal piece size distribution of brash ice was best described by the probability density function of a three-parameter lognormal distribution.
Highlights In the two less frequently navigated channels, the average porosities ranged from 1.4% to 23%. The more frequently navigated channel exhibited average porosities ranging from 8% to 21%. Total, brash ice, and side ridge porosities increased with increasing the corresponding thicknesses. Brash ice piece sizes ranged from 0.06 to 1.9 m, with average vertical and horizontal sizes up to 0.52 and 0.40 m. The distribution of horizontal piece sizes followed a three-parameter lognormal probability density function.
Brash ice macroporosity and piece size distribution in ship channels
Zhaka, Vasiola (author) / Bridges, Robert (author) / Riska, Kaj (author) / Cwirzen, Andrzej (author)
2023-10-13
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Ship resistance in thick brash ice
Elsevier | 1980
|Ship bow shape effects on brash ice channel resistance
Elsevier | 2022
|Observations of Snow–Slush–Snow Ice Transformation and Properties of Brash Ice in Ship Channels
DOAJ | 2023
|Ice-Tank Data on Brash-Ice Loads against Barges
British Library Online Contents | 1998
|