A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
The perennial dissatisfaction of urban upbringing
Abstract This study provides new evidence to the urban malaise (unhappiness) hypothesis. A new key finding is added: Urban upbringing is associated with lower happiness levels later in life. This outcome is above and beyond the effect associated with living currently in a city. Strikingly, the negative effect of urbanicity in one's youth is about as strong statistically, and practically (effect size), as the effect of urbanicity given one's current place of residence. In addition, our findings show that there may be a happiness benefit to growing up on a farm. The present study is inspired by Lederbogen et al. (2011) who showed that growing up in a city has a negative lasting effect in a person's life. We also find interactive effects: people who grew up in larger areas but live in smaller areas have lower levels of happiness than those who grew up in smaller areas and continue to live there. There is also an interactive effect with age: older people are happier if they grew up on a farm. These results aim to stimulate discussion by challenging the mainstream pro-urban view that people are happier in cities. This study is based on U.S. data, thus our results may not generalize to other countries or historical contexts.
Highlights Using the General Social Survey (GSS) dataset from 1972 to 2016, we provide new evidence to the urban malaise hypothesis. Urban upbringing results in lower happiness levels later in life. This effect is above and beyond the unhappiness associated with living currently in a city.
The perennial dissatisfaction of urban upbringing
Abstract This study provides new evidence to the urban malaise (unhappiness) hypothesis. A new key finding is added: Urban upbringing is associated with lower happiness levels later in life. This outcome is above and beyond the effect associated with living currently in a city. Strikingly, the negative effect of urbanicity in one's youth is about as strong statistically, and practically (effect size), as the effect of urbanicity given one's current place of residence. In addition, our findings show that there may be a happiness benefit to growing up on a farm. The present study is inspired by Lederbogen et al. (2011) who showed that growing up in a city has a negative lasting effect in a person's life. We also find interactive effects: people who grew up in larger areas but live in smaller areas have lower levels of happiness than those who grew up in smaller areas and continue to live there. There is also an interactive effect with age: older people are happier if they grew up on a farm. These results aim to stimulate discussion by challenging the mainstream pro-urban view that people are happier in cities. This study is based on U.S. data, thus our results may not generalize to other countries or historical contexts.
Highlights Using the General Social Survey (GSS) dataset from 1972 to 2016, we provide new evidence to the urban malaise hypothesis. Urban upbringing results in lower happiness levels later in life. This effect is above and beyond the unhappiness associated with living currently in a city.
The perennial dissatisfaction of urban upbringing
Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam (author) / Valente, Rubia R. (author)
Cities ; 104
2020-04-24
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Urban sprawl: neighbourhood dissatisfaction and urban preferences. Some evidence from Flanders
| Online Contents | 2016
Urban sprawl : neighbourhood dissatisfaction and urban preferences : some evidence from Flanders
| BASE | 2016
Urban problems and public dissatisfaction in the metropolitan areas of England
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1983
Dissatisfaction and office productivity
| Emerald Group Publishing | 1995
Residential Problems, Dissatisfaction, and Mobility
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1979