Density <italic>my</italic> way: Community attitudes to neighbourhood densification scenarios: Fid-Bau Portal

Density my way: Community attitudes to neighbourhood densification scenarios

Bolleter, Julian / Edwards, Nicole / Cameron, Robert / Hooper, Paula

Abstract Transit Oriented Development (TOD) within existing urban areas often confronts entrenched community resistance. This paper documents the results of an Australian survey systematically evaluating the level of community support of densification strategies around a central train station in a greyfield suburban setting – based on theories in planning such as TOD (Pedestrian Pockets and Transit Boulevardes), Greenspace-Oriented Development (GOD) and ‘hidden density’ approaches. This paper's original contribution stems from using a hypothetical site which obviates localised issues and interests and allows for a comparatively neutral assessment of different densification approaches. The results are instructive and unanticipated. Support was highest for precinct-scale approaches to densification (TOD and GOD), while antipathy remains towards ‘hidden density,’ dispersed, single-storey background infill. The results also reveal significant and essential differences in support for densification models based on gender, with females more supportive of GOD approaches than conventional TOD. The paper highlights the need for revised policies to deliver alternative urban densification approaches, such as GOD, ensure the liveability of densification along Transit Boulevardes, and impede deeply unpopular ‘hidden density’ or background infill.

Highlights • Resistance to urban densification arises from an often-noisy minority while a majority are quietly supportive. • The paper reveals general community support for precinct-scale approaches to densification. • The paper reveals general community antipathy towards dispersed background infill. • Policies enabling ad hoc background infill should be tightened to build impetus behind precinct-led urban densification.